Tunstall Jenny R, O'Gorman John G, Shum David H K
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Behavioural Basis of Health, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
J Neuropsychol. 2016 Mar;10(1):116-29. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12060. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
Three studies are reported on the development of a four-disc version of the Tower of London test of planning ability. The first (n = 138) involved the selection of items based on rational and empirical criteria to provide a short test of graded difficulty suitable for use with children and clinical populations. The second study (n = 480) checked the properties of the 10-item test on a new sample and in addition examined the internal consistency and factor structure of the test. The third study (n = 61) examined the test-retest reliability of the test over a period of 1 month. The difficulty level of the test remained relatively stable from sample to sample and was sensitive to linear trend in performance from age 5 years up to 30 years. Total score did not reflect the action of a single underlying construct but rather appeared to index a number of factors. Scores were reasonably stable over the 1-month period studied, at least for the children's sample employed. The four-disc version is a promising method of assessing planning in children and adolescents in clinical situations.
本文报告了三项关于伦敦塔计划能力测试四盘版本开发的研究。第一项研究(n = 138)基于理性和实证标准选择项目,以提供一个难度分级的简短测试,适用于儿童和临床人群。第二项研究(n = 480)在新样本上检验了这个10项测试的特性,此外还考察了测试的内部一致性和因子结构。第三项研究(n = 61)考察了该测试在1个月时间内的重测信度。测试的难度水平在不同样本间保持相对稳定,并且对5岁至30岁人群的表现线性趋势敏感。总分并未反映单一潜在结构的作用,而是似乎指示了多个因素。在研究的1个月期间内,分数相当稳定,至少对于所采用的儿童样本是如此。四盘版本是在临床情境中评估儿童和青少年计划能力的一种有前景的方法。