• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦敦塔修订版的发展

Development of the Tower of London-Revised.

作者信息

Schnirman G M, Welsh M C, Retzlaff P D

机构信息

University of Northern Colorado, Greeley 80639, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 1998 Dec;5(4):355-60. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500404.

DOI:10.1177/107319119800500404
PMID:9835658
Abstract

The objective of this work was to reconstruct the Tower of London (TOL) test in order to increase its reliability. A three-phase process was undertaken to accomplish this goal. In Phase 1, the TOL item pool was increased, the task was administered to a sample of college students (N = 50), and item-total correlations were calculated in order to identify the items that had the highest correlation with the total score. In Phase 2, the revised 30-item TOL (TOL-R) was administered to a second sample (N = 50) and the internal consistency reliability (Chronbach alpha) was estimated at. 794. Finally, Phase 3 examined the test-retest reliability of the TOH-R on a new sample (N = 34) and the stability was found to be acceptable at r =.70.

摘要

这项工作的目的是重建伦敦塔(TOL)测试,以提高其可靠性。为此采取了一个三阶段的过程。在第一阶段,增加了TOL项目库,将该任务施测于一组大学生样本(N = 50),并计算项目与总分的相关性,以识别与总分相关性最高的项目。在第二阶段,将修订后的30个项目的TOL(TOL-R)施测于第二个样本(N = 50),估计内部一致性信度(克朗巴赫α系数)为0.794。最后,在第三阶段,对一个新样本(N = 34)检验了TOL-R的重测信度,发现稳定性在r = 0.70时是可接受的。

相似文献

1
Development of the Tower of London-Revised.伦敦塔修订版的发展
Assessment. 1998 Dec;5(4):355-60. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500404.
2
The development and preliminary validation of the Tower of Hanoi-revised.
Assessment. 2001 Jun;8(2):167-76. doi: 10.1177/107319110100800205.
3
Assessing Planning Ability Across the Adult Life Span: Population-Representative and Age-Adjusted Reliability Estimates for the Tower of London (TOL-F).评估成年期的计划能力:伦敦塔测验(TOL-F)的人群代表性及年龄调整后的信度估计
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Mar;31(2):148-64. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv088. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
4
Assessment of planning performance in clinical samples: Reliability and validity of the Tower of London task (TOL-F).临床样本中计划能力的评估:伦敦塔任务(TOL-F)的信度和效度
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:646-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.017. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
5
Test-retest reliability of the Tower of London Planning Task (TOL-F).伦敦塔计划任务(TOL-F)的重测信度。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):925-31. doi: 10.1037/pas0000097. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
6
Assessing planning ability with the Tower of London task: psychometric properties of a structurally balanced problem set.采用伦敦塔任务评估规划能力:结构平衡问题集的心理测量学特性。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):46-53. doi: 10.1037/a0025174. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
7
The Tower of London spatial problem-solving task: enhancing clinical and research implementation.伦敦塔空间问题解决任务:加强临床与研究应用
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002 Aug;24(5):586-604. doi: 10.1076/jcen.24.5.586.1006.
8
Towers of Hanoi and London: is the nonshared variance due to differences in task administration?汉诺塔与伦敦塔任务:非共享方差是否源于任务执行方式的差异?
Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Apr;90(2):562-72. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.2.562.
9
Individual differences in cognitive planning on the Tower of Hanoi task: neuropsychological maturity or measurement error?汉诺塔任务中认知规划的个体差异:神经心理成熟度还是测量误差?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 May;42(4):551-6.
10
Assessment of planning ability: Psychometric analyses on the unidimensionality and construct validity of the Tower of London Task (TOL-F).规划能力评估:对伦敦塔任务(TOL-F)的单维度性和结构效度的心理测量分析。
Neuropsychology. 2016 Mar;30(3):346-360. doi: 10.1037/neu0000238. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of psychophysiological well being on executive functions among anaesthesia residents.心理生理幸福感对麻醉住院医师执行功能的影响。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 Apr 1;42(4):366-368. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002106. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
Psychophysiological wellbeing in a class of dental students attending dental school: anxiety, burnout, post work executive performance and a 24 hours physiological investigation during a working day.一类牙科专业学生在牙科学院就读期间的心理生理健康状况:焦虑、倦怠、工作后执行能力表现以及工作日24小时生理调查。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 22;15:1344970. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1344970. eCollection 2024.
3
PsycAssist: A Web-Based Artificial Intelligence System Designed for Adaptive Neuropsychological Assessment and Training.
心理辅助系统(PsycAssist):一个基于网络的人工智能系统,专为适应性神经心理学评估与训练而设计。
Brain Sci. 2024 Jan 24;14(2):122. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14020122.
4
Assessment of Motor Planning and Inhibition Performance in Non-Clinical Sample-Reliability and Factor Structure of the Tower of London and Go/No Go Computerized Tasks.非临床样本中运动规划与抑制能力的评估——伦敦塔任务和计算机化的“是/否”任务的信度及因素结构
Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 27;11(11):1420. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111420.
5
The Effects of Adult Ageing and Culture on the Tower of London Task.成人衰老与文化对伦敦塔任务的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 22;12:631458. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631458. eCollection 2021.
6
Assessing Planning Ability Across the Adult Life Span in a Large Population-Representative Sample: Reliability Estimates and Normative Data for the Tower of London (TOL-F) Task.在一个大的人口代表性样本中评估整个成年期的规划能力:伦敦塔(TOL-F)任务的可靠性估计和常模数据。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 May;25(5):520-529. doi: 10.1017/S1355617718001248. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
7
Online Self-Administered Cognitive Testing Using the Amsterdam Cognition Scan: Establishing Psychometric Properties and Normative Data.使用阿姆斯特丹认知扫描进行在线自我管理认知测试:建立心理测量学特性和常模数据。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 30;20(5):e192. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9298.
8
A quantitative meta-analysis of neurocognitive functioning in posttraumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍神经认知功能的定量荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan;141(1):105-140. doi: 10.1037/a0038039. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
9
Executive function and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review.执行功能与额叶:一项元分析综述
Neuropsychol Rev. 2006 Mar;16(1):17-42. doi: 10.1007/s11065-006-9002-x.
10
Impaired executive function in male MDMA ("ecstasy") users.男性摇头丸使用者的执行功能受损。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Sep;175(3):331-41. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1832-8.