Ibáñez Samaniego L, Pérez Valderas M, Fernández Yunquera A, Rincón Rodríguez D, López Baena J A, Matilla Peña A, Catalina Rodríguez M V, Clemente Ricote G, Bañares Cañizares R, Salcedo Plaza M
Liver Unit, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Liver Unit, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Transplant Proc. 2014 Nov;46(9):3084-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.09.175.
Decompensated cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) is one of the main indications for liver transplantation (LT) in Spain. Recurrence of HCV after LT is the main cause of graft loss and death in HCV-positive recipients. Advanced donor age determines a more aggressive recurrence of HCV and a shorter survival. In this setting, in our liver unit, grafts from younger donors are allocated to HCV-positive recipients. The aim of this study was a comparative analysis of allocation of grafts in HCV-positive recipients versus other etiologies and the impact on waiting list time, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score progression until LT, need of admission in a hospital, survival until LT.
This was a retrospective study from the cohort of patients included in the waiting list for LT owing to decompensated cirrhosis in the Hospital Gregorio Marañón from January 2008 to June 2013.
A total of 91 patients were included; 63 patients (69.23%) received LT; 19 (20.88%) retired from the waiting list: 6 because of improvement, 11 (12.08%) because of death. In both groups, the age of recipients was similar (HCV 52 y vs other 53 y; P = .549). HCV patients were included in the waiting list with lower MELD score than other etiologies (HCV 16.1 vs other 19.4; P = .010); nevertheless, MELD score was similar at the time of LT in both groups (HCV 18.9 vs other 19.4; P = .675). Time on waiting list was significantly longer in HCV patients (198 d vs 86 d; P = .002) and they were admitted in hospital more days (30 d vs 12 d; P = .03). Donor age in the HCV group was significantly lower (64.3 y vs 54.7 y; P = .006). The intention-to-treat survival analysis did not show differences between the groups (log rank = 0.504).
HCV patients with decompensated cirrhosis receive grafts from younger donors. HCV patients remain waiting longer for an optimal organ and suffer MELD deterioration and more days admitted in hospital. These differences in allocation of grafts did not affect final survival. In our experience, designating younger organs to HCV-positive patients does not penalize neither HCV recipients nor recipients with other etiologies.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)所致失代偿期肝硬化是西班牙肝移植(LT)的主要适应证之一。LT术后HCV复发是HCV阳性受者移植物丢失和死亡的主要原因。供体年龄较大决定了HCV复发更严重且生存期较短。在这种情况下,在我们的肝病科,来自年轻供体的移植物被分配给HCV阳性受者。本研究的目的是比较HCV阳性受者与其他病因受者的移植物分配情况,以及对等待时间、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分进展直至LT、住院需求、LT前生存期的影响。
这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为2008年1月至2013年6月在格雷戈里奥·马拉尼翁医院因失代偿期肝硬化而列入LT等待名单的患者队列。
共纳入91例患者;63例(69.23%)接受了LT;19例(20.88%)从等待名单中退出:6例因病情改善,11例(12.08%)因死亡。两组受者年龄相似(HCV组52岁 vs 其他组53岁;P = 0.549)。HCV患者列入等待名单时的MELD评分低于其他病因患者(HCV组16.1 vs 其他组19.4;P = 0.010);然而,两组在LT时的MELD评分相似(HCV组18.9 vs 其他组19.4;P = 0.675)。HCV患者的等待时间明显更长(198天 vs 86天;P = 0.002),且住院天数更多(30天 vs 12天;P = 0.03)。HCV组的供体年龄明显更低(64.3岁 vs 54.7岁;P = 0.006)。意向性治疗生存分析显示两组之间无差异(对数秩 = 0.504)。
失代偿期肝硬化的HCV患者接受来自年轻供体的移植物。HCV患者等待合适器官的时间更长,MELD评分恶化,住院天数更多。这些移植物分配差异并未影响最终生存。根据我们的经验,将年轻器官分配给HCV阳性患者对HCV受者和其他病因受者均无不利影响。