Suppr超能文献

来自已故供体的肺叶移植:囊性纤维化小体型患者的有效选择。

Lobar lung transplantation from deceased donors: a valid option for small-sized patients with cystic fibrosis.

作者信息

Stanzi A, Decaluwe H, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, Nafteux P, Van Veer H, Dupont L, Verleden G M, Van Raemdonck D

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Pneumology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2014 Nov;46(9):3154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.09.168.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Small-sized patients with cystic fibrosis usually face long waiting times for a suitable lung donor. Reduced-size lung transplantation (LTx) was promoted to shorten waiting times. We compared donor and recipient characteristics and outcome in lobar ([L]) versus full-size ([FS]) lung recipients.

METHODS

Between July 1, 1991, and February 28, 2011, 535 isolated LTx were performed, including 74 in cystic fibrosis patients (8 L, 66 FS). Patients were followed up until September 2012.

RESULTS

[L] recipients were younger, smaller, and lighter. Sex, waiting times, and donor data (age, sex, height, weight, PaO2/FiO2, and ventilation time) were comparable. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used more often in [L]; cold ischemia was comparable for first lung but longer in [L] for second lung; implantation times were comparable. In-hospital mortality rate was 0% in [L] versus 3% in [FS]. Both intensive care unit and hospital stay were longer in [L]. Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction was more pronounced in [L] at T0 and at T48. FEV1 increased significantly in both groups from preoperative value. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was absent in [L] and diagnosed in 18 patients in [FS], accounting for 6 of 15 late deaths. All [L] are still alive. No differences in survival were found between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although hindered by a higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction, L-LTx is a viable option with excellent survival and pulmonary function comparable to FS-LTx.

摘要

背景

患有囊性纤维化的小体型患者通常要等待很长时间才能获得合适的肺供体。为缩短等待时间,人们推广了减体积肺移植(LTx)。我们比较了接受叶状肺移植([L])与全尺寸肺移植([FS])的供体和受体特征及结果。

方法

在1991年7月1日至2011年2月28日期间,共进行了535例孤立性肺移植,其中74例为囊性纤维化患者(8例接受叶状肺移植,66例接受全尺寸肺移植)。对患者随访至2012年9月。

结果

接受叶状肺移植的患者更年轻、体型更小且体重更轻。性别、等待时间和供体数据(年龄、性别、身高、体重、动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度比值及通气时间)具有可比性。叶状肺移植中体外循环的使用更为频繁;首次肺移植的冷缺血时间具有可比性,但叶状肺移植的第二次肺移植冷缺血时间更长;植入时间具有可比性。叶状肺移植的院内死亡率为0%,全尺寸肺移植为3%。叶状肺移植的重症监护病房住院时间和住院总时间均更长。在T0和T48时,叶状肺移植中3级原发性移植物功能障碍更为明显。两组的第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)均较术前值显著增加。叶状肺移植组未出现闭塞性细支气管炎综合征,全尺寸肺移植组有18例被诊断为此病,占15例晚期死亡病例中的6例。所有接受叶状肺移植的患者均存活。两组间生存率无差异。

结论

尽管原发性移植物功能障碍的发生率较高,但叶状肺移植仍是一种可行的选择,其生存率和肺功能良好,与全尺寸肺移植相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验