Greulich Luana, Al Otaiba Stephanie, Schatschneider Christopher, Wanzek Jeanne, Ortiz Miriam, Wagner Richard
Learn Disabil Q. 2014 Nov;37(4):204-217. doi: 10.1177/0731948714526999.
The purpose of this study was to use a mixed methods approach to learn about inadequate response to a year-long multi-tier RTI model that allowed first-grade students to move up and down tiers. Participants were 156 students who received supplemental intervention services during a larger multi-tier RTI study involving classrooms and 522 students across 10 schools. Findings from an all-subset regression indicate letter word reading, the fluency composite, and blending words explained the most variance (15%) in response among initial skills. Adding additional teacher ratings of behavior and academics, accounted for a small amount of additional variance (3%) in group membership. The ROC curve analysis indicated 87.5% of students were correctly classified, yielding a sensitivity of 85.3 and a specificity of 65.0. Findings from qualitative observations of intervention sessions suggest inadequate responders demonstrated physical and verbal task avoidance and displayed emotions of hopelessness and shame. Implications for practice are discussed.
本研究的目的是采用混合方法,了解在为期一年的多层次回应干预(RTI)模式下反应不足的情况,该模式允许一年级学生在不同层次间流动。参与者包括在一项涉及多个班级的更大规模多层次RTI研究中接受补充干预服务的156名学生,以及来自10所学校的522名学生。全子集回归分析结果表明,字母单词阅读、流利度综合得分和单词拼读在初始技能反应方面解释了最大方差(15%)。增加教师对行为和学业的额外评分,在组成员资格方面解释了少量额外方差(3%)。ROC曲线分析表明,87.5%的学生被正确分类,灵敏度为85.3,特异度为65.0。干预课程定性观察结果表明,反应不足者表现出身体和言语上的任务回避,并表现出绝望和羞耻情绪。文中讨论了对实践的启示。