• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用扎根理论收集和分析参与观察数据的方法工具。

Methodological tools for the collection and analysis of participant observation data using grounded theory.

作者信息

Laitinen Heleena, Kaunonen Marja, Astedt-Kurki Päivi

机构信息

Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Finland.

出版信息

Nurse Res. 2014 Nov;22(2):10-5. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.2.10.e1284.

DOI:10.7748/nr.22.2.10.e1284
PMID:25423936
Abstract

AIM

To give clarity to the analysis of participant observation in nursing when implementing the grounded theory method.

BACKGROUND

Participant observation (PO) is a method of collecting data that reveals the reality of daily life in a specific context. In grounded theory, interviews are the primary method of collecting data but PO gives a distinctive insight, revealing what people are really doing, instead of what they say they are doing. However, more focus is needed on the analysis of PO.

DATA SOURCES

An observational study carried out to gain awareness of nursing care and its electronic documentation in four acute care wards in hospitals in Finland.

REVIEW METHODS

Discussion of using the grounded theory method and PO as a data collection tool.

DISCUSSION

The following methodological tools are discussed: an observational protocol, jotting of notes, microanalysis, the use of questioning, constant comparison, and writing and illustrating. Each tool has specific significance in collecting and analysing data, working in constant interaction.

CONCLUSION

Grounded theory and participant observation supplied rich data and revealed the complexity of the daily reality of acute care. In this study, the methodological tools provided a base for the study at the research sites and outside. The process as a whole was challenging. It was time-consuming and it required rigorous and simultaneous data collection and analysis, including reflective writing. Using these methodological tools helped the researcher stay focused from data collection and analysis to building theory.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH/PRACTICE: Using PO as a data collection method in qualitative nursing research provides insights. It is not commonly discussed in nursing research and therefore this study can provide insight, which cannot be seen or revealed by using other data collection methods. Therefore, this paper can produce a useful tool for those who intend to use PO and grounded theory in their nursing research.

摘要

目的

在运用扎根理论方法时,明确护理中参与观察的分析方法。

背景

参与观察(PO)是一种收集数据的方法,可揭示特定背景下的日常生活实际情况。在扎根理论中,访谈是收集数据的主要方法,但参与观察能提供独特见解,揭示人们实际在做什么,而非他们声称自己在做什么。然而,需要更多地关注参与观察的分析。

数据来源

在芬兰医院的四个急性护理病房进行的一项观察性研究,以了解护理及其电子文档情况。

综述方法

讨论使用扎根理论方法以及将参与观察作为数据收集工具。

讨论

探讨了以下方法工具:观察方案、记录笔记、微观分析、提问的运用、持续比较以及撰写和说明。每种工具在收集和分析数据方面都具有特定意义,且相互之间持续互动。

结论

扎根理论和参与观察提供了丰富的数据,揭示了急性护理日常现实的复杂性。在本研究中,这些方法工具为研究现场内外的研究提供了基础。整个过程具有挑战性。它耗时且需要严格同时进行数据收集和分析,包括反思性写作。使用这些方法工具有助于研究人员从数据收集和分析到构建理论都保持专注。

对研究/实践的启示:在定性护理研究中使用参与观察作为数据收集方法可提供见解。它在护理研究中并不常被讨论,因此本研究可提供使用其他数据收集方法无法看到或揭示的见解。因此,本文可为那些打算在护理研究中使用参与观察和扎根理论的人提供一个有用的工具。

相似文献

1
Methodological tools for the collection and analysis of participant observation data using grounded theory.运用扎根理论收集和分析参与观察数据的方法工具。
Nurse Res. 2014 Nov;22(2):10-5. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.2.10.e1284.
2
Challenges in combining different data sets during analysis when using grounded theory.运用扎根理论进行分析时,在合并不同数据集过程中所面临的挑战。
Nurse Res. 2014 May;21(5):14-8. doi: 10.7748/nr.21.5.14.e1220.
3
Reflecting on the challenges of choosing and using a grounded theory approach.反思选择和运用扎根理论方法所面临的挑战。
Nurse Res. 2014 Nov;22(2):16-22. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.2.16.e1272.
4
Using unstructured diaries for primary data collection.使用非结构化日记进行原始数据收集。
Nurse Res. 2015 May;22(5):25-9. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.5.25.e1322.
5
Using a synthesised technique for grounded theory in nursing research.在护理研究中运用扎根理论的综合技术。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Aug;18(16):2251-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02684.x. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
6
How to recognise a 'quality' grounded theory research study.如何识别一项“高质量”的扎根理论研究。
Aust J Adv Nurs. 2005 Mar-May;22(3):48-52.
7
Maximizing Theoretical Contributions of Participant Observation While Managing Challenges.在应对挑战的同时最大化参与观察的理论贡献。
Qual Health Res. 2015 Aug;25(8):1117-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315578636. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
8
[Participant observation as data collection method in nursing research].[参与观察作为护理研究中的数据收集方法]
Hoitotiede. 1994;6(2):51-7.
9
[The grounded theory method of conducting nursing research].
Hoitotiede. 1990;2(3):199-204.
10
Field notes and theoretical memos in grounded theory.扎根理论中的田野笔记与理论备忘录。
West J Nurs Res. 2007 Feb;29(1):65-79. doi: 10.1177/0193945906292557.

引用本文的文献

1
Multisensory Food Experiences in Northern Norway: An Exploratory Study.挪威北部的多感官食物体验:一项探索性研究。
Foods. 2024 Jul 8;13(13):2156. doi: 10.3390/foods13132156.
2
Early Impressions and Adoption of the AtriAmp for Managing Arrhythmias Following Congenital Heart Surgery.先天性心脏病手术后使用AtriAmp治疗心律失常的早期印象与应用情况
Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 Aug;46(6):1592-1599. doi: 10.1007/s00246-024-03573-y. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
3
Equity, diversity and inclusion in simulation-based education: constructing a developmental framework for medical educators.
基于模拟的教育中的公平、多样性与包容性:为医学教育工作者构建一个发展框架。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 May 16;9(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00292-5.
4
Early Impressions and Adoption of the AtriAmp for Managing Arrhythmias Following Congenital Heart Surgery.先天性心脏病手术后使用AtriAmp治疗心律失常的早期印象与应用情况
Res Sq. 2024 Mar 21:rs.3.rs-4125331. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4125331/v1.
5
Qualitative Study of Barriers to Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication among Rural Women in India.印度农村女性抗高血压药物依从性障碍的定性研究
Int J Hypertens. 2019 Jan 23;2019:5749648. doi: 10.1155/2019/5749648. eCollection 2019.
6
Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to assess a qualitative study.外科文献用户指南:如何评估定性研究。
Can J Surg. 2018 Jun;61(3):208-214. doi: 10.1503/cjs.013117.
7
Treatment Decision Making in Patients with Bladder Cancer.膀胱癌患者的治疗决策制定
Bladder Cancer. 2015 Oct 26;1(2):151-158. doi: 10.3233/BLC-150029.