Moreton Kirsty L
Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, West Midlands B15 2TT, UK
Med Law Rev. 2015 Spring;23(2):303-14. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwu033. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
This case commentary discusses a recent case concerning the competence of a 13-year-old girl to consent to the termination of her pregnancy. It critically analyses four specific elements of the judgment--Gillick competence, the impact of best interests, judicial deference to medical opinion, and individualism and the construction of undue influence. It concludes by commending the approach taken by the court as a reinstatement of the law as originally intended in Gillick but is nonetheless cautious as to its likely overall effect upon child decision-making.
本案例评论讨论了一个近期案例,该案例涉及一名13岁女孩是否有能力同意终止妊娠。它批判性地分析了判决的四个具体要素——吉利克能力、最佳利益的影响、司法对医学意见的尊重,以及个人主义和不当影响的构成。文章最后赞扬了法院采取的做法,认为这是对吉利克案最初意图的法律恢复,但同时对其可能对儿童决策产生的总体影响持谨慎态度。