Spyridopoulos Ioakim, Noman Awsan, Ahmed Javed M, Das Raj, Edwards Richard, Purcell Ian, Bagnall Alan, Zaman Azfar, Egred Mohaned
Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, UK.
Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Jun;4(3):270-7. doi: 10.1177/2048872614561480. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
Early identification of higher risk patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) will allow a more aggressive strategy and approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shock index (ratio of heart rate/systolic blood pressure on admission) as a predictor of mortality post PPCI in addition to other parameters.
We analysed prospectively collected data on 3049 STEMI patients treated with PPCI in a large tertiary centre between March 2008-December 2011, out of which 2424 patients were aged up to 75 years (young) and 625 patients were older than 75 years (elderly).
Compared to younger patients, in-hospital mortality rates were four-fold higher in the elderly (11.5% vs 2.8%, odds ratio (OR) 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-5.9). Cardiogenic shock (OR 8.7 (5.1-14.6)), non-TIMI3 (Thrombosis In Myocardial Infarction) flow post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (OR 5.0 (3.1-7.9)), age over 75 (OR 3.5 (2.3-5.3)) and a positive shock index pre PPCI (OR 3.5 (2.0-5.9)) were the strongest independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. For long-term outcome (median follow-up period 454 days) we excluded 141 (4.6%) patients that died during the initial hospital stay. Previous angina (hazard ratio (HR) 2.9), and previous cerebrovascular events (HR 3.7) were predictors of adverse outcome in the younger patients, while previous myocardial infarction (HR 2.0) and a positive shock index (HR 2.3) were predictors in the elderly. Cardiogenic shock prior to PPCI was not able to predict long-term outcome for in-hospital survivors.
Mortality rates following PPCI were higher in elderly patients although remained acceptable. Invasively measured shock index before PPCI is the strongest independent predictor of long-term outcome in elderly patients. In addition, predictors of in-hospital mortality were similar across different age groups but differed significantly in relation to longer-term mortality.
早期识别出患有ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)并接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的高危患者,将有助于采取更积极的策略和方法。本研究的目的是评估除其他参数外,休克指数(入院时心率与收缩压之比)作为PPCI术后死亡率预测指标的价值。
我们前瞻性分析了2008年3月至2011年12月在一家大型三级中心接受PPCI治疗的3049例STEMI患者的资料,其中2424例患者年龄在75岁及以下(年轻组),625例患者年龄大于75岁(老年组)。
与年轻患者相比,老年患者的院内死亡率高出四倍(11.5%对2.8%,比值比(OR)3.5,95%置信区间(CI)2.0 - 5.9)。心源性休克(OR 8.7(5.1 - 14.6))、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后非TIMI3(心肌梗死溶栓)血流(OR 5.0(3.1 - 7.9))、年龄超过75岁(OR 3.5(2.3 - 5.3))以及PPCI前休克指数阳性(OR 3.5(2.0 - 5.9))是院内死亡率最强的独立预测因素。对于长期预后(中位随访期454天),我们排除了在初次住院期间死亡的141例(4.6%)患者。既往心绞痛(风险比(HR)2.9)和既往脑血管事件(HR 3.7)是年轻患者不良预后的预测因素,而既往心肌梗死(HR 2.0)和休克指数阳性(HR 2.3)是老年患者的预测因素。PPCI前的心源性休克无法预测院内幸存者的长期预后。
PPCI术后老年患者的死亡率较高,但仍在可接受范围内。PPCI前有创测量的休克指数是老年患者长期预后最强的独立预测因素。此外,不同年龄组院内死亡率的预测因素相似,但长期死亡率的预测因素差异显著。