Suppr超能文献

休克指数作为直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期预后的一种新型预测指标。

Shock-index as a novel predictor of long-term outcome following primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Spyridopoulos Ioakim, Noman Awsan, Ahmed Javed M, Das Raj, Edwards Richard, Purcell Ian, Bagnall Alan, Zaman Azfar, Egred Mohaned

机构信息

Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, UK.

Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Jun;4(3):270-7. doi: 10.1177/2048872614561480. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Early identification of higher risk patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) will allow a more aggressive strategy and approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shock index (ratio of heart rate/systolic blood pressure on admission) as a predictor of mortality post PPCI in addition to other parameters.

METHODS

We analysed prospectively collected data on 3049 STEMI patients treated with PPCI in a large tertiary centre between March 2008-December 2011, out of which 2424 patients were aged up to 75 years (young) and 625 patients were older than 75 years (elderly).

RESULTS

Compared to younger patients, in-hospital mortality rates were four-fold higher in the elderly (11.5% vs 2.8%, odds ratio (OR) 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-5.9). Cardiogenic shock (OR 8.7 (5.1-14.6)), non-TIMI3 (Thrombosis In Myocardial Infarction) flow post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (OR 5.0 (3.1-7.9)), age over 75 (OR 3.5 (2.3-5.3)) and a positive shock index pre PPCI (OR 3.5 (2.0-5.9)) were the strongest independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. For long-term outcome (median follow-up period 454 days) we excluded 141 (4.6%) patients that died during the initial hospital stay. Previous angina (hazard ratio (HR) 2.9), and previous cerebrovascular events (HR 3.7) were predictors of adverse outcome in the younger patients, while previous myocardial infarction (HR 2.0) and a positive shock index (HR 2.3) were predictors in the elderly. Cardiogenic shock prior to PPCI was not able to predict long-term outcome for in-hospital survivors.

CONCLUSION

Mortality rates following PPCI were higher in elderly patients although remained acceptable. Invasively measured shock index before PPCI is the strongest independent predictor of long-term outcome in elderly patients. In addition, predictors of in-hospital mortality were similar across different age groups but differed significantly in relation to longer-term mortality.

摘要

未标注

早期识别出患有ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)并接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的高危患者,将有助于采取更积极的策略和方法。本研究的目的是评估除其他参数外,休克指数(入院时心率与收缩压之比)作为PPCI术后死亡率预测指标的价值。

方法

我们前瞻性分析了2008年3月至2011年12月在一家大型三级中心接受PPCI治疗的3049例STEMI患者的资料,其中2424例患者年龄在75岁及以下(年轻组),625例患者年龄大于75岁(老年组)。

结果

与年轻患者相比,老年患者的院内死亡率高出四倍(11.5%对2.8%,比值比(OR)3.5,95%置信区间(CI)2.0 - 5.9)。心源性休克(OR 8.7(5.1 - 14.6))、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后非TIMI3(心肌梗死溶栓)血流(OR 5.0(3.1 - 7.9))、年龄超过75岁(OR 3.5(2.3 - 5.3))以及PPCI前休克指数阳性(OR 3.5(2.0 - 5.9))是院内死亡率最强的独立预测因素。对于长期预后(中位随访期454天),我们排除了在初次住院期间死亡的141例(4.6%)患者。既往心绞痛(风险比(HR)2.9)和既往脑血管事件(HR 3.7)是年轻患者不良预后的预测因素,而既往心肌梗死(HR 2.0)和休克指数阳性(HR 2.3)是老年患者的预测因素。PPCI前的心源性休克无法预测院内幸存者的长期预后。

结论

PPCI术后老年患者的死亡率较高,但仍在可接受范围内。PPCI前有创测量的休克指数是老年患者长期预后最强的独立预测因素。此外,不同年龄组院内死亡率的预测因素相似,但长期死亡率的预测因素差异显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验