Suppr超能文献

连续性血浆滤过吸附治疗烧伤脓毒症的临床研究

[Clinical study on continuous plasma filtration absorption treatment for burn sepsis].

作者信息

Meng Aihua, Ren Yong, Yang Lang, He Lixin, Zeng Sheng, Liu Qiang

出版信息

Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;30(4):310-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To observe the therapeutic effects of continuous plasma filtration absorption (CPFA) treatment on burn sepsis.

METHODS

Thirty burn patients with sepsis hospitalized in Beijing Fengtai You'anmen Hospital from July 2009 to October 2012 were treated by CPFA for twice besides routine treatment. The blood samples were collected at five sites (A, B, C, D, and E, respectively) of blood purification equipment before and after CPFA, before and after hemoabsorption, and before hemofiltration. The plasma levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor (sTNFR) I , and sTNFR-II from sites A, C, and E were determined with ELISA before CPFA was performed for the first time, and those from sites B and D were determined with ELISA after CPFA was performed for the first time. Plasma levels of the above-mentioned cytokines from sites A and B were determined with ELISA before CPFA and after CPFA was performed for the second time. The data of plasma levels of IL-1βP3, IL-1RA, sTNFR-I, sTNFR-II, and TNF-α before CPFA and after CPFA was performed for the second time were collected for calculation of the ratios of IL-1RA to IL-1β and sTNFR-I plus sTNFR-II to TNF-α. The expression rate of human leukocyte antigen DR (HLA-DR) on the CD14 positive monocytes, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, body temperature, pulse, respiratory rate, and leukocyte count of patients were evaluated or recorded before CPFA and after CPFA was performed for the second time. Patients'condition was observed. Data were processed with paired t test.

RESULTS

The plasma levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 from site B after CPFA was performed for the second time were significantly lower than those from site A before CPFA was performed for the first time (with t values respectively 7.05, 5.23, 4.73, 2.37, P values below 0.01). After CPFA was performed for the first time, the plasma levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 from site D were significantly lower than those from site C before CPFA was performed for the first time (with t values respectively 5.48, 2. 17, 1.78, P < 0.05 or P <0.01). The plasma levels of all cytokines were close between site B after CPFA was performed for the first time and site E before CPFA was performed for the first time (with t values from 0.04 to 1.05, P values above 0.05). The plasma levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 from site B after CPFA was performed for the second time were significantly lower than those from site A before CPFA was performed for the second time (with t values from 1.87 to 5.93, P <0.05 or P <0.01). The ratios of IL-1RA to IL-1β and sTNFR-I plus sTNFR-II to TNF-α, and expression rate of HLA-DR were increased significantly after CPFA was performed for the second time as compared with those before CPFA (with t values from 3.99 to 7. 80, P values below 0.01). APACHE II score after CPFA was performed for the second time was 11 ± 6, which was lower than that before CPFA (22 ± 7, t =4.63, P <0.01). After CPFA was performed for the second time, body temperature, pulse, and respiratory rate of patients were improved (with t values from 1.95 to 3.55, P values below 0.05) , and the leukocyte count was significantly decreased (t =4.36, P <0.01) as compared with those before CPFA. All patients survived and were discharged with length of stay of (27 ± 31) d, and no adverse effects occurred during CPFA treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

CPFA, which combines hemoabsorption and hemofiltration, can facilitate the treatment of burn sepsis by decreasing the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines efficiently, alleviating systemic inflammatory response, and improving the immune status.

摘要

目的

观察持续血浆滤过吸附(CPFA)治疗烧伤脓毒症的疗效。

方法

选取2009年7月至2012年10月在北京丰台右安门医院住院的30例烧伤脓毒症患者,在常规治疗基础上采用CPFA治疗2次。分别于首次CPFA前、首次血液吸附前后、血液滤过前,以及第二次CPFA前后,在血液净化设备的5个部位(分别为A、B、C、D、E)采集血样。采用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)检测首次CPFA前A、C、E部位及首次CPFA后B、D部位血浆中肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-10(IL-10)、白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂(IL-1RA)、可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体(sTNFR)I和sTNFR-II的水平。采用ELISA检测首次CPFA前及第二次CPFA后A、B部位上述细胞因子的血浆水平。收集首次CPFA前及第二次CPFA后IL-1β、IL-1RA、sTNFR-I、sTNFR-II和TNF-α的血浆水平数据,并计算IL-1RA与IL-1β的比值以及sTNFR-I加sTNFR-II与TNF-α的比值。评估并记录患者CD14阳性单核细胞上人白细胞抗原DR(HLA-DR)的表达率、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分(APACHE)II评分、体温、脉搏、呼吸频率及白细胞计数。观察患者病情。数据采用配对t检验进行处理。

结果

第二次CPFA后B部位血浆中TNF-α、IL-1β、IL-6和IL-10的水平显著低于首次CPFA前A部位(t值分别为7.05、5.23、4.73、2.37,P值均<0.01)。首次CPFA后,D部位血浆中TNF-α、IL-1β和IL-6的水平显著低于首次CPFA前C部位(t值分别为5.48、2.17、1.78,P<0.05或P<0.01)。首次CPFA后B部位与首次CPFA前E部位所有细胞因子的血浆水平相近(t值为0.041.05,P值>0.05)。第二次CPFA后B部位血浆中TNF-α、IL-1β和IL-6的水平显著低于第二次CPFA前A部位(t值为1.875.93,P<0.05或P<0.01)。第二次CPFA后IL-1RA与IL-1β的比值、sTNFR-I加sTNFR-II与TNF-α的比值以及HLA-DR的表达率较CPFA前均显著升高(t值为3.997.80,P值<0.01)。第二次CPFA后APACHE II评分为11±6,低于CPFA前(22±7,t=4.63,P<0.01)。第二次CPFA后患者体温、脉搏及呼吸频率均有所改善(t值为1.953.5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验