Kracskó Bertalan, Garai Ildikó, Barna Sándor, Szabó Gábor Tamás, Rácz Ildikó, Kolozsvári Rudolf, Tar Balázs, Jenei Csaba, Varga József, Kõszegi Zsolt
Institute of Cardiology, University of Debrecen Clinical Center; Debrecen-Hungary.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2015 Jun;15(6):469-74. doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5500. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
The objective of this study was to find the correlation between the severity of perfusion abnormality detected by scintigraphy and the FFR value, as well as the localization of a particular coronary lesion. On the basis of FFR values and the corresponding left ventricular segments, we proposed a combined index to aim for better correlation with myocardial ischemia than the FFR parameter alone.
Twenty-eight patients (male: 22, female: 6, age 62±7.62) having FFR measurements and myocardial perfusion SPECT studies were enrolled in our retrospective analysis. FFR measurements on 36 vessels (20 LAD, 6 LCx, 10 RCA) with intermediate stenosis (40%-60%) were compared to the Tc-99m SestaMIBI myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. SPECT studies were performed before the invasive procedure in all cases. We introduced a new ischemic index, the left ventricular ischemic index (LVIi), by combining FFR values with the number of corresponding myocardial segments (N) [LVIi=N x (1-FFR)]. This index correlated with the regional myocardial perfusion defects identified on the scintigrams. A perfusion reversibility score of 2 or above was considered indicative of active ischemia (regional difference score: rDSc). For the statistical analysis, we used linear regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to compare the different parameters.
A close linear relationship was found between the LVIi and rDSc values (p<0.001) with linear regression analysis. When analyzing all FFR values independently of the localization of the lesions, they also correlated significantly to the rDSc, but this relation was not as close. LVIi predicted active ischemia (≥2 rDSc) on myocardial scintigraphy with 78% sensitivity and 94% specificity when the cutoff value was set to 0.96. FFR alone predicted ischemia on scintigraphy with 72% sensitivity and 94% specificity at the best 0.8 cut-off value. The area under the ROC curve was significantly higher for LVIi than FFR (0.94 vs. 0.87; p<0.05).
The scintigraphic data indicate that an LVIi >0.96 implies a clinically relevant stenotic lesion. In our opinion, FFR values, weighted with the corresponding left ventricular segments, should be taken into consideration for the best clinical decision-making.
本研究旨在探寻通过闪烁显像检测到的灌注异常严重程度与血流储备分数(FFR)值之间的相关性,以及特定冠状动脉病变的定位。基于FFR值和相应的左心室节段,我们提出了一个综合指数,旨在比单独的FFR参数与心肌缺血有更好的相关性。
28例(男性22例,女性6例,年龄62±7.62岁)接受了FFR测量和心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)研究的患者纳入我们的回顾性分析。对36支具有中度狭窄(40%-60%)的血管(20支左前降支、6支左旋支、10支右冠状动脉)进行FFR测量,并与锝-99m甲氧基异丁基异腈(Tc-99m SestaMIBI)心肌灌注SPECT研究结果进行比较。所有病例均在侵入性操作前进行SPECT研究。我们通过将FFR值与相应心肌节段数量(N)相结合,引入了一个新的缺血指数,即左心室缺血指数(LVIi)[LVIi = N×(1 - FFR)]。该指数与闪烁显像上识别出的局部心肌灌注缺损相关。灌注可逆性评分达到2或更高被认为提示存在活动性缺血(区域差异评分:rDSc)。对于统计分析,我们使用线性回归分析和受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析来比较不同参数。
线性回归分析显示LVIi与rDSc值之间存在密切的线性关系(p<0.001)。在不考虑病变定位独立分析所有FFR值时,它们也与rDSc显著相关,但这种关系不那么密切。当临界值设定为0.96时,LVIi预测心肌闪烁显像上的活动性缺血(≥2 rDSc)的灵敏度为78%,特异度为94%。单独的FFR在最佳临界值0.8时预测闪烁显像上缺血的灵敏度为72%,特异度为94%。LVIi的ROC曲线下面积显著高于FFR(0.94对0.87;p<0.05)。
闪烁显像数据表明,LVIi>0.96提示存在具有临床意义的狭窄病变。我们认为,为了做出最佳临床决策,应考虑结合相应左心室节段加权后的FFR值。