Dżygało K, Golicki D, Kowalska A, Szypowska A
Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Dzialdowska 1, 01-184, Warsaw, Poland.
Acta Diabetol. 2015 Apr;52(2):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s00592-014-0604-0. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
Insulin degludec is a new-generation ultra-long-acting basal insulin which offers a significantly more predictable glucose-lowering effect than other long-acting insulin analogues. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of treatment with insulin degludec and long-acting insulin analogues glargine and detemir in type 1 diabetic (T1D) patients by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The following electronic databases were searched up to January 2014: MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. Additional references were obtained from the reviewed articles. There were included randomised controlled trials of at least 12-week duration with basal-bolus regimen therapies in T1D patients.
Current analysis included four studies involving 1,846 T1D patients. The combined data from all trials showed a statistically significant reduction in the basal insulin dose (MD -0.042, 95 % CI -0.067 to -0.018, p = 0.001) and the total daily insulin dose (MD -0.072, 95 % CI 0.016 to -0.027, p = 0.002) in the degludec group compared to other long-acting analogues. There was also a significant reduction of nocturnal hypoglycaemia in the degludec group compared to the controls (rate ratio 0.697, 95 % CI 0.617-0.786, p = 0.000). There were no differences between the groups in terms of glycated haemoglobin values, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and adverse events.
Basal-bolus treatment with insulin degludec was superior to long-acting insulin analogues detemir and glargine in reducing the rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia. In comparison with other long-acting analogues, treatment with insulin degludec was safe and patients obtained similar metabolic control expressed by HbA1c and FPG levels with the added benefit of a reduced basal and total insulin dose.
德谷胰岛素是新一代超长效基础胰岛素,与其他长效胰岛素类似物相比,其降血糖作用的可预测性显著更高。本研究旨在通过系统评价和荟萃分析,比较德谷胰岛素与长效胰岛素类似物甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素在1型糖尿病(T1D)患者中的治疗效果。
检索截至2014年1月的以下电子数据库:MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆。从综述文章中获取其他参考文献。纳入的是T1D患者采用基础-餐时胰岛素治疗方案、持续时间至少12周的随机对照试验。
当前分析纳入了四项涉及1846例T1D患者的研究。所有试验的合并数据显示,与其他长效类似物相比,德谷胰岛素组的基础胰岛素剂量(MD -0.042,95%CI -0.067至-0.018,p = 0.001)和每日总胰岛素剂量(MD -0.072,95%CI -0.016至-0.027,p = 0.002)有统计学显著降低。与对照组相比,德谷胰岛素组夜间低血糖也有显著降低(率比0.697,95%CI 0.617 - 0.786,p = 0.000)。两组在糖化血红蛋白值、空腹血糖(FPG)和不良事件方面无差异。
在降低夜间低血糖发生率方面,德谷胰岛素基础-餐时治疗优于长效胰岛素类似物地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素。与其他长效类似物相比,德谷胰岛素治疗安全,患者通过糖化血红蛋白和空腹血糖水平所体现的代谢控制情况相似,且基础胰岛素和总胰岛素剂量降低带来了额外益处。