Scalo Julieta, Desai Pooja, Rascati Karen
College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 2409 University Avenue A1930, Austin, TX, 78712, USA,
Qual Life Res. 2015 May;24(5):1223-33. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0842-1. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) associated with insomnia and prescription hypnotic use.
Primary outcomes were mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) scores from the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey. Using multiple regression, subjects in the 2005 through 2009 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey with diagnosed insomnia were compared against those without that diagnosis. Among subjects with diagnosed insomnia, users of prescription hypnotics were compared against nonusers.
Of 104,274 adults, 1.3 % (n = 1,401) had an insomnia diagnosis. Of those, 45.6 % (n = 639) used prescription hypnotics. For subjects with insomnia, mean PCS and MCS scores were 9.2 and 7.0 points lower (p < 0.001), respectively. After controlling for demographic and clinical covariates, differences remained significant (PCS:5.1;
6.2; p < 0.001). Among subjects with insomnia, HRQoL scores were not different between prescription hypnotic users (n = 639) and nonusers (n = 762). Analysis by drug class revealed lower PCS scores (difference: 7.5, p < 0.001) with benzodiazepine use (n = 129) versus benzodiazepine receptor agonist use (n = 493), but the adjusted difference was not significant (difference: 3.8, p = .018).
Diagnosed insomnia was associated with consistent decreases in both physical and mental HRQoL scores, regardless of whether prescription hypnotics were used. Benzodiazepine use may be associated with a further decrease in physical HRQoL scores. Although limited by its retrospective design, this study provides a first look at real-world hypnotic use outcomes at a national level. Important next steps include studies with patients serving as their own controls, and further evaluation of the sensitivity of HRQoL instruments to the effects of insomnia treatments.
评估与失眠及处方催眠药物使用相关的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。
主要结局为12项简短健康调查问卷中的心理成分总结(MCS)和身体成分总结(PCS)得分。采用多元回归分析,将2005年至2009年医疗支出面板调查中诊断为失眠的受试者与未诊断为失眠的受试者进行比较。在诊断为失眠的受试者中,将处方催眠药物使用者与非使用者进行比较。
在104,274名成年人中,1.3%(n = 1,401)被诊断为失眠。其中,45.6%(n = 639)使用处方催眠药物。对于失眠受试者,平均PCS和MCS得分分别低9.2分和7.0分(p < 0.001)。在控制了人口统计学和临床协变量后,差异仍然显著(PCS:5.1;MCS:6.2;p < 0.001)。在失眠受试者中,处方催眠药物使用者(n = 639)和非使用者(n = 762)的HRQoL得分没有差异。按药物类别分析显示,使用苯二氮䓬类药物(n = 129)的受试者PCS得分低于使用苯二氮䓬受体激动剂的受试者(n = 493)(差异:7.5,p < 0.001),但调整后的差异不显著(差异:3.8,p = 0.018)。
无论是否使用处方催眠药物,诊断为失眠均与身体和心理HRQoL得分持续下降相关。使用苯二氮䓬类药物可能与身体HRQoL得分进一步下降相关。尽管本研究受其回顾性设计的限制,但它首次在国家层面审视了现实世界中催眠药物的使用结果。重要的后续步骤包括以患者自身作为对照的研究,以及进一步评估HRQoL工具对失眠治疗效果的敏感性。