Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan,
Eur Radiol. 2015 May;25(5):1366-74. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3512-3. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
To evaluate the utility of multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) findings alone and in combination for differentiating focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (f-AIP) from pancreatic carcinoma (PC).
The study group comprised 22 f-AIP lesions and 61 PC lesions. Two radiologists independently evaluated CT findings. Frequencies of findings were compared between f-AIP and PC. Statistical, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
Homogeneous enhancement during the portal phase (AIP, 59 % vs. PC, 3 %; P < 0.001), dotted enhancement during the pancreatic phase (50 % vs. 7 %; P < 0.001), duct-penetrating sign (46 % vs. 2 %; P < 0.001), enhanced duct sign (36 % vs. 2 %; P < 0.001) and capsule-like rim (46 % vs. 3 %; P < 0.001) were more frequently observed in AIP. Ring-like enhancement during the delayed phase (5 % vs. 46 %; P < 0.001) and peripancreatic strands with a length of at least 10 mm (5 % vs. 39 %; P = 0.001) were more frequently observed in PC. AIP was identified with 82 % sensitivity and 98 % specificity using four of these seven findings. Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in dotted enhancement (P = 0.004), duct-penetrating sign (P < 0.001) and capsule-like rim (P = 0.007).
The combination of CT findings may allow improvements in differentiating f-AIP from PC.
• f-AIP can mimic PC on imaging findings. • The differentiation of f-AIP from PC is important in patient management. • Some CT findings can be used to identify AIP. • The combination of CT findings will improve differentiation from PC.
评估多期增强 CT 表现单独及联合应用对鉴别局灶型自身免疫性胰腺炎(f-AIP)与胰腺癌(PC)的作用。
研究组纳入 22 例 f-AIP 病变和 61 例 PC 病变。两名放射科医生独立评估 CT 表现。比较 f-AIP 和 PC 间的表现频率。进行统计学、单变量和多变量分析。
门脉期均匀强化(AIP,59% vs. PC,3%;P<0.001)、胰腺期点状强化(50% vs. 7%;P<0.001)、胆管穿透征(46% vs. 2%;P<0.001)、强化胆管征(36% vs. 2%;P<0.001)和包膜样边缘(46% vs. 3%;P<0.001)在 AIP 中更常见。延迟期环形强化(5% vs. 46%;P<0.001)和至少 10mm 长的胰周条索影(5% vs. 39%;P=0.001)在 PC 中更常见。使用这 7 种表现中的 4 种,AIP 的敏感度为 82%,特异度为 98%。多变量分析显示,点状强化(P=0.004)、胆管穿透征(P<0.001)和包膜样边缘(P=0.007)差异有统计学意义。
CT 表现联合应用有助于提高 f-AIP 与 PC 的鉴别能力。
f-AIP 的影像学表现可与 PC 相似。
区分 f-AIP 和 PC 对患者管理非常重要。
一些 CT 表现可用于识别 AIP。
CT 表现联合应用将改善与 PC 的鉴别。