Carey Michael P, Senn Theresa E, Walsh Jennifer L, Coury-Doniger Patricia, Urban Marguerite A, Fortune Thierry, Vanable Peter A, Carey Kate B
Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Coro Building, Suite 309, 164 Summit Avenue, Providence, RI, 02906, USA,
AIDS Behav. 2015 Jul;19(7):1228-46. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0960-3.
We report results from a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of a video-based sexual risk reduction intervention and to measure assessment reactivity. Patients (N = 1010; 56 % male; 69 % African American) receiving care at a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic were assigned to one of four conditions formed by crossing assessment condition (i.e., sexual health vs. general health) with intervention condition (i.e., sexual risk reduction intervention vs. general health promotion). After completing their assigned baseline assessment, participants received their assigned intervention, and subsequently returned for follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Participants in all conditions reduced their self-reported sexual risk behavior, and the incidence of new STIs declined from baseline through the follow-ups; however, there was no effect of intervention or assessment condition. We conclude that further risk reduction will require more intensive interventions, especially in STI clinics that already provide excellent clinical care.
我们报告了一项随机对照试验的结果,该试验旨在评估基于视频的性风险降低干预措施的疗效,并测量评估反应性。在性传播感染(STI)诊所接受治疗的患者(N = 1010;56%为男性;69%为非裔美国人)被分配到由评估条件(即性健康与一般健康)与干预条件(即性风险降低干预与一般健康促进)交叉形成的四种条件之一。在完成指定的基线评估后,参与者接受指定的干预,随后在3、6、9和12个月返回进行随访评估。所有条件下的参与者都减少了自我报告的性风险行为,新性传播感染的发生率从基线到随访期间有所下降;然而,干预或评估条件没有效果。我们得出结论,进一步降低风险将需要更强化的干预措施,尤其是在已经提供优质临床护理的性传播感染诊所。