Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 28;21(1):1469. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11490-5.
Brief behavioral interventions are seen as an efficient way to improve knowledge, change behavior, and reduce provider stigma regarding sexual health. When grounded in evidence-based behavioral change techniques and delivered using Brief Sexuality-related Communication (BSC) tools, brief behavioral interventions can address client-driven sexual health goals in a single session with their provider. Evidence for the efficacy of brief interventions for creating gains in sexual health comes largely from resource rich settings, and there is a lack of knowledge of how brief interventions can be implemented in the more resource constrained environments of low- and middle-income countries. As a first step in developing a brief intervention to address sexual health issues in Moldova, this paper reports on qualitative data collected from Moldovan providers to understand their attitudes, willingness and perceived barriers to the brief intervention and its implementation.
Thirty-nine in-depth interviews (IDI) were conducted between February and March 2020, with health providers recruited from three primary health care institutions, two Youth Friendly Health Centers and counselors from three NGOs who work with key populations in Moldova, including health centers selected from two cites - the capital city, Chisinau and from the Comrat Region. The IDI addressed four domains of provider attitudes: 1) attitudes towards the intervention; 2) willingness and motivation to implement the intervention; 3) logistics of providing the intervention and 4) ability to implement the intervention. A coding analysis approach was applied to all interview transcripts.
Providers largely reported being willing to be trained in and implement the brief intervention. Willingness to implement the intervention stemmed from two perceptions: that it would improve the ability of providers to talk with their clients about sex, and that vulnerable groups would benefit from these conversations. However, while there were generally positive attitudes towards the intervention, providers consistently reported structural barriers to their perceived ability to implement the intervention.
While providers reported high levels of initial acceptance of a brief behavioral intervention, care is needed to ensure that brief interventions, and the training of providers on brief interventions, incorporate cultural attitudes and norms around sex, particularly in highly patriarchal settings, and provide opportunities for providers to practice the intervention in ways that address their assumptions and implicit biases.
简短的行为干预被视为一种提高知识、改变行为和减少性健康提供者污名的有效方法。当基于循证行为改变技术并使用简要的性相关沟通 (BSC) 工具时,简短的行为干预可以在与提供者的一次会议中解决客户驱动的性健康目标。简短干预在创造性健康收益方面的有效性的证据主要来自资源丰富的环境,而对于如何在资源有限的中低收入国家更具挑战性的环境中实施简短干预,人们知之甚少。作为在摩尔多瓦制定简短干预措施以解决性健康问题的第一步,本文报告了从摩尔多瓦提供者那里收集的定性数据,以了解他们对简短干预及其实施的态度、意愿和感知障碍。
2020 年 2 月至 3 月期间,共进行了 39 次深入访谈 (IDI),参与者为来自三家基层医疗机构、两家青年友好健康中心的卫生提供者,以及来自与摩尔多瓦关键人群合作的三家非政府组织的顾问,包括从两个城市选择的卫生中心——首都基希讷乌和科姆拉特地区。IDI 涉及提供者态度的四个领域:1)对干预措施的态度;2)实施干预措施的意愿和动机;3)提供干预措施的后勤保障;4)实施干预措施的能力。对所有访谈记录进行了编码分析方法。
提供者普遍表示愿意接受培训并实施简短干预措施。实施干预措施的意愿源于两种看法:这将提高提供者与客户谈论性的能力,弱势群体将从这些对话中受益。然而,尽管提供者对干预措施普遍持积极态度,但他们始终报告存在结构性障碍,阻碍了他们实施干预措施的能力。
虽然提供者报告了对简短行为干预措施的高度初始接受度,但需要谨慎确保简短干预措施和提供者对简短干预措施的培训纳入性方面的文化态度和规范,特别是在高度父权制的环境中,并为提供者提供实践干预措施的机会,以解决他们的假设和隐含偏见。