Stockley Amelia J, Forbes Karen
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Nov 30;14:259. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0259-0.
The standards and outcomes outlined in the General Medical Council's publication 'Tomorrow's Doctors' include proposals that medical professionalism be included in undergraduate curricula. Learning the values and attitudes necessary to become a 'doctor as a professional' has traditionally been left largely to the informal and hidden curricula. There remains no consensus or confirmed evidence upon which to base best practice for teaching in this area. In 2010, as part of a revision of the fifth year curriculum the University of Bristol Medical School introduced tutorials which focused on students' achievement of the learning objectives in 'Tomorrow's Doctors Outcomes 3: the doctor as a professional'. This study sought to explore the students' experiences of these tutorials in order to develop the evidence base further.
Sixteen medical students participated in three focus-group interviews exploring their experiences of medical professionalism tutorials. A course evaluation questionnaire to all fifth year students also provided data. Data were analysed using the principles of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
Four main themes were identified: students' aversion to 'ticking-boxes', lack of engagement by the students, lack of engagement by the tutors and students' views on how medical professionalism should be taught.
A curriculum innovation which placed the achievement of medical professionalism in the formal curriculum was not unanimously embraced by students or faculty. Further consideration of the students' aversion to 'ticking-boxes' is warranted. With continued demand for increased accountability and transparency in medical education, detailed check-lists of specific learning objectives will continue to feature as a means by which medical schools and learners demonstrate attainment. Students' experiences and acceptance of these check-lists deserves attention in order to inform teaching and learning in this area. Learner and faculty 'buy in' are imperative to the success of curriculum change and vital if the students are to attain the intended learning objectives. Effective faculty development and student induction programmes could be employed to facilitate engagement by both parties.
英国医学总会出版物《明日医生》中概述的标准和成果包括将医学职业精神纳入本科课程的提议。传统上,培养成为“专业医生”所需的价值观和态度很大程度上依赖于非正式和隐性课程。在这一领域的教学最佳实践方面,目前尚无共识或确凿证据。2010年,作为五年级课程修订的一部分,布里斯托大学医学院引入了专注于学生实现《明日医生成果3:专业医生》学习目标的辅导课程。本研究旨在探索学生对这些辅导课程的体验,以进一步拓展证据基础。
16名医学生参与了三次焦点小组访谈,探讨他们对医学职业精神辅导课程的体验。向所有五年级学生发放的课程评价问卷也提供了数据。数据采用解释现象学分析原则进行分析。
确定了四个主要主题:学生对“打勾式”做法的反感、学生参与度不足、教师参与度不足以及学生对医学职业精神教学方式的看法。
将医学职业精神的培养纳入正式课程的课程创新并未得到学生或教师的一致认可。有必要进一步考虑学生对“打勾式”做法的反感。随着医学教育对问责制和透明度要求的不断提高,详细的具体学习目标清单将继续作为医学院校和学习者展示学习成果的一种方式。学生对这些清单的体验和接受程度值得关注,以便为该领域的教学提供参考。学习者和教师的“认同”对于课程改革的成功至关重要,如果学生要实现预期的学习目标,这一点至关重要。可以采用有效的教师发展和学生入学指导计划来促进双方的参与。