Leysen Marijke, Nijs Jo, Meeus Mira, Paul van Wilgen C, Struyf Filip, Vermandel Alexandra, Kuppens Kevin, Roussel Nathalie A
Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium(1).
Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium(1); Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium.
Man Ther. 2015 Feb;20(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 14.
Several questionnaires are available to evaluate illness perceptions in patients, such as the illness perception questionnaire revised (IPQ-R) and the brief version (Brief IPQ). This study aims to systematically review the literature concerning the clinimetric properties of the IPQ-R and the Brief IPQ in patients with musculoskeletal pain. The electronic databases Web of Sciences and PubMed were searched. Studies were included when the clinimetric properties of the IPQ-R or Brief IPQ were assessed in adults with musculoskeletal pain. Methodological quality was determined using the COSMIN checklist. Eight articles were included and evaluated. The methodological quality was good for 3 COSMIN boxes, fair for 11 and poor for 3 boxes. None of the articles obtained an excellent methodological score. The results of this review suggest that the IPQ-R is a reliable questionnaire, except for illness coherence. Internal consistency is good, except for the causal domain. The IPQ-R has good construct validity, but the factor structure is unstable. Hence, the IPQ-R appears to be a useful instrument for assessing illness perceptions, but care must be taken when generalizing the results of adapted versions of the questionnaires. The Brief IPQ shows moderate overall test-retest reliability. No articles examining the validity of the Brief IPQ were found. Further research should therefore focus on the content and criterion validity of the IPQ-R and the clinimetric properties of the Brief IPQ.
有几种问卷可用于评估患者的疾病认知,比如修订后的疾病认知问卷(IPQ-R)和简版(简版IPQ)。本研究旨在系统回顾有关IPQ-R和简版IPQ在肌肉骨骼疼痛患者中的测量学特性的文献。检索了电子数据库科学网和PubMed。当在患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人中评估IPQ-R或简版IPQ的测量学特性时,纳入相关研究。使用COSMIN清单确定方法学质量。纳入并评估了8篇文章。对于3个COSMIN项目,方法学质量良好;对于11个项目,质量一般;对于3个项目,质量较差。没有文章获得优异的方法学评分。本综述结果表明,除了疾病连贯性外,IPQ-R是一个可靠的问卷。除了因果领域外,内部一致性良好。IPQ-R具有良好的结构效度,但因子结构不稳定。因此,IPQ-R似乎是评估疾病认知的一个有用工具,但在推广问卷改编版本的结果时必须谨慎。简版IPQ显示出中等程度的总体重测信度。未发现检验简版IPQ效度的文章。因此,进一步的研究应侧重于IPQ-R的内容和效标效度以及简版IPQ的测量学特性。