Blank D A, Ruckstuhl K, Yang W
Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresource in Arid Land, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 818 South Beijing Road, Urumqi 830011, China; Institute of Zoology, Kazakh Academy of Sciences, Alma-Ata 050060, Kazakhstan.
Department of Biological Sciences, University Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Zoology (Jena). 2015 Feb;118(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
Aggression serves a great variety of social functions, one of which is protection of individual territories from intruders. Territorial males of many antelope species show aggressive noncontact displays, and only rarely fight. It has been suggested that ungulate males tend to have more frequent and longer aggressive interactions with rivals of similar age or social status than with males of dissimilar status. In the present paper, we test whether territorial and non-territorial males behave in a similar manner and avoid fights, and whether or not they preferentially direct aggressive and longer agonistic interactions towards males of similar age or social status, rather than towards other classes of males. We found that territorial males usually avoided straight fights with peers, and instead mainly used noncontact displays in aggressive interactions. In contrast, non-territorial males used fights considerably more often, especially during the onset of territoriality in April to May, when these males had their most frequent aggressive interactions. Territorial bucks aggressively interacted most frequently with non-territorial males and significantly less often with other territorial males, but agonistic noncontact displays between territorial males lasted the longest. In contrast, non-territorial males addressed their aggressive noncontact displays and fights most often to peers and less frequently to sub-adults. Asymmetry in the social status of territorial vs. non-territorial males was likely responsible for the distinctively different agonistic behaviors shown by the two types of males, which in turn are likely due to the different costs and benefits each male can accrue from these aggressive interactions.
攻击行为具有多种社会功能,其中之一是保护个体领地免受入侵者侵犯。许多羚羊物种的领地雄性会表现出攻击性的非接触式展示,且很少争斗。有人提出,有蹄类雄性与年龄或社会地位相似的对手之间的攻击性互动往往比与地位不同的雄性更为频繁和持久。在本文中,我们测试领地雄性和非领地雄性的行为方式是否相似以及是否避免争斗,以及它们是否优先将攻击性和更长时间的争斗性互动指向年龄或社会地位相似的雄性,而非其他类型的雄性。我们发现,领地雄性通常避免与同伴直接争斗,而是在攻击性互动中主要使用非接触式展示。相比之下,非领地雄性更频繁地进行争斗,尤其是在4月至5月领地形成初期,此时这些雄性的攻击性互动最为频繁。领地雄鹿与非领地雄性的攻击性互动最为频繁,与其他领地雄性的互动则明显较少,但领地雄性之间的争斗性非接触展示持续时间最长。相比之下,非领地雄性的攻击性非接触展示和争斗大多针对同伴,对亚成年个体的频率较低。领地雄性与非领地雄性社会地位的不对称可能是导致这两种雄性表现出截然不同争斗行为的原因,而这反过来可能是由于每种雄性从这些攻击性互动中所能获得的不同成本和收益所致。