Ohzawa Hideyuki, Miki Atsushi, Hozumi Yasuo, Miyazaki Chieko, Sagara Yuka, Tanaka Yumiko, Shiba Satomi, Joutoku Hiromi, Sakuragi Masako, Takehara Megumi, Sakuma Yasunaru, Nishimura Wataru, Fujii Hirofumi, Yasuda Yoshikazu
Department of Breast Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke City, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke City, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Oncol Lett. 2015 Jan;9(1):119-124. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2640. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a serious adverse side-effect of anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens, in patients with breast cancer. A combination of three drugs, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor antagonist, aprepitant and dexamethasone, is recommended for antiemetic therapy. Palonosetron (PALO), a novel 5-HT receptor antagonist has been identified to be effective against delayed nausea and vomiting. In this study, the results of PALO for patients who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy were compared with that of granisetron (GRA) using a crossover study design. This study evaluated the efficacy of antiemetics in the first cycle of chemotherapy, as well as the second and third cycles. A total of 21 patients and 19 patients were assigned to PALO and GRA treatment groups during the first cycle of chemotherapy, respectively. The patients switched to the other antiemetic drug for the second chemotherapy cycle (PALO followed by GRA or GRA followed by PALO). The patients could select PALO or GRA antiemetics for the third cycle, according to their preference. A total of 21 patients selected PALO and 18 patients selected GRA in the third cycle, and one patient was withdrawn from the study as their third cycle questionnaire was not obtained. No significant differences between PALO and GRA were identified in first and second cycles. However, during the third cycle, a significant difference was observed in acute-phase complete control of emetic events between the PALO and GRA groups, which was defined as no emetic episode, no additional antiemetic treatment and no more than mild nausea, between PALO and GRA. These results demonstrated that changing antiemetics may affect the efficacy of antiemetics. This study indicates that alteration of antiemetic regimens, including drug combination and order, may improve the efficacy of antiemetic treatment.
化疗引起的恶心和呕吐是乳腺癌患者基于蒽环类化疗方案的一种严重不良副作用。推荐使用三种药物联合,即5-羟色胺(5-HT)受体拮抗剂、阿瑞匹坦和地塞米松进行止吐治疗。帕洛诺司琼(PALO),一种新型5-HT受体拮抗剂,已被证实对延迟性恶心和呕吐有效。在本研究中,采用交叉研究设计,将接受基于蒽环类化疗的患者使用帕洛诺司琼的结果与格拉司琼(GRA)的结果进行比较。本研究评估了化疗第一周期以及第二和第三周期中止吐药的疗效。在化疗第一周期,分别有21例患者和19例患者被分配到帕洛诺司琼组和格拉司琼治疗组。患者在第二个化疗周期改用另一种止吐药(帕洛诺司琼后接格拉司琼或格拉司琼后接帕洛诺司琼)。在第三个周期,患者可根据自身偏好选择帕洛诺司琼或格拉司琼止吐药。在第三个周期,共有21例患者选择了帕洛诺司琼,18例患者选择了格拉司琼,1例患者因未获得第三个周期的问卷而退出研究。在第一和第二周期中,未发现帕洛诺司琼和格拉司琼之间有显著差异。然而,在第三个周期,帕洛诺司琼组和格拉司琼组在急性期呕吐事件的完全控制方面观察到显著差异,完全控制定义为无呕吐发作、无需额外的止吐治疗且恶心不超过轻度。这些结果表明,更换止吐药可能会影响止吐药的疗效。本研究表明,改变止吐方案,包括药物组合和用药顺序,可能会提高止吐治疗的疗效。