Chang Pi-Ying, Wu Che-Wei, Chen Hsiu-Ya, Chen Hui-Chun, Cheng Kuang-I, Lu I-Cheng, Chiang Feng-Yu
Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014 Oct;30(10):499-503. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
Limited reports are available in the literature on the impact of intravenous administration of anesthetics on laryngeal electromyographic (EMG) activity. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the two commonly used intravenous anesthetics (propofol and thiamylal) on EMG amplitude evoked from the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) during thyroid surgery. A total of 40 patients were randomized to receive a bolus of propofol (0.5 mg/kg; n = 20) or thiamylal (1.5 mg/kg; n = 20) to increase anesthetic depth when the surgeon found patient movement intraoperatively. Evoked potentials were obtained before and every 1 minute after the administration of each agent for up to 5 minutes by stimulating the RLN. The magnitude of evoked potentials at each time point and hemodynamic response were compared within groups. The mean amplitude of evoked potentials did not change significantly after administration of either propofol or thiamylal (p > 0.05 within groups). Mean arterial pressure measured from 1 minute to 5 minutes was significantly lower in the propofol group than in the thiamylal group (p < 0.05). Heart rate measured within 5 minutes did not differ significantly within groups. Low dose of propofol (0.5 mg/kg) or thiamylal (1.5 mg/kg) did not affect EMG readings during neuromonitoring of the RLN in thyroid surgery. Our results show that thiamylal provides better hemodynamic stability than propofol, and is therefore a preferable agent to increase anesthesia depth and prevent further patient movement during intraoperative neuromonitoring.
关于静脉注射麻醉剂对喉肌电图(EMG)活动影响的文献报道有限。本研究的目的是确定两种常用静脉麻醉剂(丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠)对甲状腺手术期间喉返神经(RLN)诱发的EMG振幅的影响。共有40例患者被随机分为两组,一组静脉推注丙泊酚(0.5mg/kg;n = 20),另一组静脉推注硫喷妥钠(1.5mg/kg;n = 20),以便在术中外科医生发现患者有活动时增加麻醉深度。在每次给药前及给药后每隔1分钟直至5分钟,通过刺激RLN获得诱发电位。比较每组内各时间点诱发电位的大小和血流动力学反应。丙泊酚或硫喷妥钠给药后,诱发电位的平均振幅均无显著变化(组内p>0.05)。丙泊酚组1至5分钟测得的平均动脉压显著低于硫喷妥钠组(p<0.05)。5分钟内测得的心率在组内无显著差异。低剂量丙泊酚(0.5mg/kg)或硫喷妥钠(1.5mg/kg)在甲状腺手术中对RLN进行神经监测时不影响EMG读数。我们的结果表明,硫喷妥钠比丙泊酚具有更好的血流动力学稳定性,因此是在术中神经监测期间增加麻醉深度和防止患者进一步活动的更优选药物。