Shad Mujeeb U, Prasad Konasale, Forman Steven D, Haas Gretchen L, Walker Jon D, Pisarov Liubomir A, Goldstein Gerald
Mental Illness, Research, Educational and Clinical Center VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Educational and Clinical Center VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;56:112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.016. Epub 2014 May 2.
Insight concerning having a mental illness has been found to influence outcome and effectiveness of treatment. It has been studied mainly in the area of schizophrenia with few studies addressing other disorders. This study evaluates insight in individuals with bipolar disorder using the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD), a comprehensive interview for evaluation of awareness of illness and attribution of symptoms. The hypothesis was that in bipolar disorder level of awareness may be associated with numerous factors including neurocognitive function, structural changes in the frontal lobes and hippocampus evaluated by MRI, neurocognitive status, severity of mania and other psychiatric symptoms and comorbid alcoholism.
In order to evaluate this hypothesis 33 individuals with DSM-IV diagnosed bipolar disorder, some with and some without comorbid alcoholism, were administered the SUMD and a number of other procedures including a quantitative MRI measuring volume of the frontal lobes and hippocampus, a brief battery of neurocognitive tests, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and the Young Mania Rating Scale. The data were analyzed by comparing participants with and without alcoholism on these procedures using t tests and by linear multiple regression, with SUMD ratings of awareness and attribution as the dependent variables and variable sets from the other procedures administered as multivariate independent variables.
The median score obtained from the SUMD for current awareness was in a range between full awareness and uncertainty concerning presence of a mental disorder. For attribution, the median score indicated that attribution was usually made to the illness itself. None of the differences between participants with and without comorbid alcoholism were significant for the SUMD awareness and attribution scores, neurocognitive or MRI variables. The multiple regression analyses only showed a significant degree of association between the SUMD awareness score and the Young Mania Rating Scale (r(2)=.632, p<.05). A stepwise analysis indicated that items assessing degree of insight, irritability, and sleep disturbance met criteria for entry into the regression equation. None of the regression analyses for the SUMD attribution item were significant.
Apparently unlike the case for schizophrenia, most of the participants, all of whom had bipolar disorder, were aware of their symptoms and correctly related them to a mental disorder. Hypotheses concerning the relationships between degree of unawareness and possible contributors to its development including comorbid alcoholism, cognitive dysfunction and structural reduction of gray matter in the frontal region and hippocampus, were not associated with degree of unawareness but symptoms of mania were significantly associated. The apparent reason for this result is that the sample obtained a SUMD modal awareness score of 1 or 2, reflecting the area between full awareness and uncertainty about having a mental disorder. None of the participants were rated as having a 5 response reflecting the belief that s/he does not have a mental disorder.
已有研究发现,对患有精神疾病的认知会影响治疗结果和疗效。这方面的研究主要集中在精神分裂症领域,针对其他疾病的研究较少。本研究使用精神障碍无自知力评估量表(SUMD)对双相情感障碍患者的自知力进行评估,该量表是一种用于评估疾病认知和症状归因的综合性访谈工具。研究假设是,在双相情感障碍中,认知水平可能与多种因素相关,包括神经认知功能、通过磁共振成像(MRI)评估的额叶和海马体结构变化、神经认知状态、躁狂严重程度以及其他精神症状和共病酒精中毒。
为了验证这一假设,对33名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)诊断标准的双相情感障碍患者进行了研究,其中部分患者合并酒精中毒,部分患者未合并。对这些患者进行了SUMD评估以及其他一系列检查,包括定量MRI测量额叶和海马体体积、一套简短的神经认知测试、简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)和青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)。通过t检验比较合并和未合并酒精中毒的参与者在这些检查中的数据,并进行线性多元回归分析,以SUMD的认知和归因评分作为因变量,将其他检查中的变量集作为多元自变量。
SUMD当前认知的中位数得分处于对精神障碍存在完全自知和不确定之间的范围。对于症状归因,中位数得分表明通常将症状归因于疾病本身。合并和未合并酒精中毒的参与者在SUMD认知和归因得分、神经认知或MRI变量方面均无显著差异。多元回归分析仅显示SUMD认知得分与青年躁狂评定量表之间存在显著关联程度(r(2)=.632,p<.05)。逐步分析表明,评估自知力程度、易怒和睡眠障碍的项目符合纳入回归方程的标准。SUMD归因项目的回归分析均无显著意义。
显然与精神分裂症不同,所有双相情感障碍患者中的大多数都意识到了自己的症状,并正确地将其与精神障碍联系起来。关于无自知力程度与可能导致其发展的因素(包括共病酒精中毒、认知功能障碍以及额叶和海马体灰质结构减少)之间关系的假设,与无自知力程度无关,但与躁狂症状显著相关。这一结果的明显原因是,样本的SUMD认知模态评分为1或2,反映了对患有精神障碍完全自知和不确定之间的范围。没有参与者的评分为5,即认为自己没有精神障碍。