Suppr超能文献

一种用于克服颈动脉支架置入术中滤器保护装置取出困难的手动颈动脉压迫技术。

A manual carotid compression technique to overcome difficult filter protection device retrieval during carotid artery stenting.

作者信息

Nii Kouhei, Nakai Kanji, Tsutsumi Masanori, Aikawa Hiroshi, Iko Minoru, Sakamoto Kimiya, Mitsutake Takafumi, Eto Ayumu, Hanada Hayatsura, Kazekawa Kiyoshi

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikushino, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikushino, Japan.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Jan;24(1):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated the incidence of embolic protection device retrieval difficulties at carotid artery stenting (CAS) with a closed-cell stent and demonstrated the usefulness of a manual carotid compression assist technique.

METHODS

Between July 2010 and October 2013, we performed 156 CAS procedures using self-expandable closed-cell stents. All procedures were performed with the aid of a filter design embolic protection device. We used FilterWire EZ in 118 procedures and SpiderFX in 38 procedures. The embolic protection device was usually retrieved by the accessory retrieval sheath after CAS. We applied a manual carotid compression technique when it was difficult to navigate the retrieval sheath through the deployed stent. We compared clinical outcomes in patients where simple retrieval was possible with patients where the manual carotid compression assisted technique was used for retrieval.

RESULTS

Among the 156 CAS procedures, we encountered 12 (7.7%) where embolic protection device retrieval was hampered at the proximal stent terminus. Our manual carotid compression technique overcame this difficulty without eliciting neurologic events, artery dissection, or stent deformity.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing closed-cell stent placement, embolic protection device retrieval difficulties may be encountered at the proximal stent terminus. Manual carotid compression assisted retrieval is an easy, readily available solution to overcome these difficulties.

摘要

背景

我们调查了使用闭孔支架进行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)时栓塞保护装置取出困难的发生率,并证明了手动颈动脉压迫辅助技术的有效性。

方法

在2010年7月至2013年10月期间,我们使用自膨胀闭孔支架进行了156例CAS手术。所有手术均在滤器设计的栓塞保护装置辅助下进行。我们在118例手术中使用了FilterWire EZ,在38例手术中使用了SpiderFX。CAS术后,栓塞保护装置通常通过配套的取出鞘进行取出。当取出鞘难以穿过已展开的支架时,我们应用了手动颈动脉压迫技术。我们比较了能够简单取出的患者与使用手动颈动脉压迫辅助技术取出的患者的临床结果。

结果

在156例CAS手术中,我们遇到12例(7.7%)在支架近端末端栓塞保护装置取出受阻的情况。我们的手动颈动脉压迫技术克服了这一困难,且未引发神经系统事件、动脉夹层或支架变形。

结论

在接受闭孔支架置入的患者中,可能会在支架近端末端遇到栓塞保护装置取出困难。手动颈动脉压迫辅助取出是克服这些困难的一种简单、易于采用的解决方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验