Trivedi Sumita, Jie Hyun-Bae, Ferris Robert L
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Cancer Immunology Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Semin Oncol. 2014 Oct;41(5):678-84. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
For decades the primary available cancer therapies were relatively nonspecific cytotoxic agents which, while effective in some patients, were limited by narrow therapeutic indices, extensive toxicity and development of resistance, likely due to tumor heterogeneity. Although these chemotherapies remain common tools of conventional treatment, the approval of a growing number of tumor antigen (TA)-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) by the US Food and Drug Administration has driven a shift in the paradigm of cancer therapy. For a subset of patients with lymphoma, colorectal, head and neck, and breast cancers, the inclusion of rituximab (anti-CD20), cetuximab (anti-human epidermal growth factor 1), and trastuzumab (anti-human epidermal growth factor 2) has resulted in overall improved clinical response rates and survival advantages. The mechanisms that contribute to these effects are limited not only to inhibition of signaling pathways but also include cell-mediated cytotoxicity by innate immune cells and priming of effector cells of adoptive immunity triggered by the TA-specific mAb. However, as the use of these therapeutic mAbs has become more widespread, it has been observed that there is significant variability of response in patients treated with these agents. Thus, the factors that mediate this variability in clinical responses must be elucidated to optimize the use of TA-specific mAbs.
几十年来,主要可用的癌症治疗方法是相对非特异性的细胞毒性药物,这些药物虽然在一些患者中有效,但受到治疗指数狭窄、广泛毒性和耐药性发展的限制,这可能是由于肿瘤异质性所致。尽管这些化疗方法仍然是传统治疗的常用手段,但美国食品药品监督管理局批准的肿瘤抗原(TA)特异性单克隆抗体(mAb)越来越多,推动了癌症治疗模式的转变。对于一部分淋巴瘤、结直肠癌、头颈癌和乳腺癌患者,使用利妥昔单抗(抗CD20)、西妥昔单抗(抗人表皮生长因子1)和曲妥珠单抗(抗人表皮生长因子2)已使总体临床缓解率提高,并具有生存优势。促成这些效果的机制不仅限于抑制信号通路,还包括先天免疫细胞介导的细胞毒性以及TA特异性mAb引发的过继性免疫效应细胞的启动。然而,随着这些治疗性mAb的使用越来越广泛,人们观察到接受这些药物治疗的患者反应存在显著差异。因此,必须阐明介导这种临床反应差异的因素,以优化TA特异性mAb的使用。