International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Am Heart J. 2014 Nov;168(5):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.022. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
To evaluate the first experience of real-time instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurement by clinicians.
The iFR is a new vasodilator-free index of coronary stenosis severity, calculated as a trans-lesion pressure ratio during a specific period of baseline diastole, when distal resistance is lowest and stable. Because all previous studies have calculated iFR offline, the feasibility of real-time iFR measurement has never been assessed.
Three hundred ninety-two stenoses with angiographically intermediate stenoses were included in this multicenter international analysis. Instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were performed in real time on commercially available consoles. The classification agreement of coronary stenoses between iFR and FFR was calculated.
Instantaneous wave-free ratio and FFR maintain a close level of diagnostic agreement when both are measured by clinicians in real time (for a clinical 0.80 FFR cutoff: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC(AUC)] 0.87, classification match 80%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.90; for a ischemic 0.75 FFR cutoff: iFR ROC(AUC) 0.90, classification match 88%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.85; if the FFR 0.75-0.80 gray zone is accounted for: ROC(AUC) 0.93, classification match 92%). When iFR and FFR are evaluated together in a hybrid decision-making strategy, 61% of the population is spared from vasodilator while maintaining a 94% overall agreement with FFR lesion classification.
When measured in real time, iFR maintains the close relationship to FFR reported in offline studies. These findings confirm the feasibility and reliability of real-time iFR calculation by clinicians.
评估临床医生首次使用实时瞬时无波比(iFR)测量的经验。
iFR 是一种新的冠状动脉狭窄严重程度的无扩张剂指数,通过在基线舒张期特定时间段内计算跨病变压力比来计算,此时远端阻力最低且稳定。由于之前所有的研究都是离线计算 iFR,因此从未评估过实时 iFR 测量的可行性。
本多中心国际分析纳入了 392 处具有中间狭窄程度的狭窄病变。在市售的控制台实时进行瞬时无波比和血流储备分数(FFR)测量。计算 iFR 和 FFR 对冠状动脉狭窄病变的分类一致性。
当临床医生实时测量时,瞬时无波比和 FFR 保持密切的诊断一致性(对于临床 0.80 的 FFR 临界值:接受者操作特征曲线下的面积[ROC(AUC)]为 0.87,分类匹配为 80%,最佳 iFR 临界值为 0.90;对于缺血性 0.75 的 FFR 临界值:iFR 的 ROC(AUC)为 0.90,分类匹配为 88%,最佳 iFR 临界值为 0.85;如果考虑到 FFR 的 0.75-0.80 灰色区域:ROC(AUC)为 0.93,分类匹配为 92%)。当以混合决策策略评估 iFR 和 FFR 时,61%的人群无需使用血管扩张剂,同时与 FFR 病变分类的总体一致性保持在 94%。
当实时测量时,iFR 与离线研究中报告的与 FFR 的密切关系得以保持。这些发现证实了临床医生实时计算 iFR 的可行性和可靠性。