• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力导丝生理性病变评估的临床应用:日本心血管介入治疗协会专家共识文件更新 2022 版。

Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Jul;37(3):425-439. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00863-1. Epub 2022 May 11.

DOI:10.1007/s12928-022-00863-1
PMID:35543896
Abstract

Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio are widely accepted and recommended in Western and Japanese guidelines for appropriate percutaneous coronary intervention. There are, however, many differences in clinical situations between Japan and Western countries. Therefore, the Task Force on coronary physiology of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) has proposed an expert consensus document to summarize current evidence and suggest the practical use of physiological lesion assessment in Japan.

摘要

在西方和日本的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南中,广泛接受和推荐了血流储备分数和瞬时无波比率。然而,日本和西方国家的临床情况存在许多差异。因此,日本心血管介入治疗学会(CVIT)的冠状动脉生理学工作组提出了一份专家共识文件,以总结当前的证据,并建议在日本实际应用生理学病变评估。

相似文献

1
Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022.压力导丝生理性病变评估的临床应用:日本心血管介入治疗协会专家共识文件更新 2022 版。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Jul;37(3):425-439. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00863-1. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.使用压力导丝进行生理性病变评估的临床应用:日本心血管介入治疗学会专家共识文件
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 Jan;34(1):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s12928-018-0559-0. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
3
Revisiting the Optimal Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Thresholds for Predicting the Physiological Significance of Coronary Artery Disease.重新探讨用于预测冠状动脉疾病生理学意义的最佳血流储备分数和瞬时无波比值阈值。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec;11(12):e007041. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007041.
4
Consensus document on the clinical application of invasive functional coronary angiography from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.日本心血管介入治疗协会关于有创功能冠状动脉造影临床应用的共识文件。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Apr;39(2):109-125. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-00988-5. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
5
Focused update of expert consensus statement: Use of invasive assessments of coronary physiology and structure: A position statement of the society of cardiac angiography and interventions.专家共识声明重点更新:冠状动脉生理与结构的侵入性评估应用:心脏血管造影和介入学会立场声明
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):336-347. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27672. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
6
Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio as Predictors of the Placebo-Controlled Response to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.分数血流储备和瞬时无波比率作为稳定单支冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗安慰剂对照反应的预测因子。
Circulation. 2018 Oct 23;138(17):1780-1792. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033801.
7
Fractional flow reserve and resting indices for coronary physiologic assessment: Practical guide, tips, and tricks.用于冠状动脉生理评估的血流储备分数和静息指数:实用指南、技巧与窍门。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):598-611. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26933. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
8
Assessment of left main artery stenosis with fractional flow reserve is affected by downstream stenosis in the left anterior descending artery.采用血流储备分数评估左主干动脉狭窄会受到左前降支下游狭窄的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2015 Aug;26 Suppl 1:e35-7. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000202.
9
Physiologic Assessment After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Functionally Optimized Revascularization.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的生理学评估与功能优化血运重建。
Cardiol Clin. 2024 Feb;42(1):55-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2023.07.007.
10
[Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio for the physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis in the catheterization laboratory: Practical tips].[用于导管实验室冠状动脉狭窄生理评估的血流储备分数和瞬时无波比值:实用技巧]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2017 Feb;66(1):32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in State-of-the-Art Management for Left Main Disease.左主干病变的最新管理中的性别差异。
JACC Adv. 2025 Aug;4(8):102009. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102009.
2
Impact of Antiplatelet Therapy on 5-Year Outcomes After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Deferral of Revascularization in Nonsignificant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.抗血小板治疗对非显著阻塞性冠状动脉疾病中基于血流储备分数指导延迟血运重建术后5年结局的影响。
Circ Rep. 2024 Jul 20;6(8):313-321. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0069. eCollection 2024 Aug 9.
3
State-of-the-art percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease in Japan.

本文引用的文献

1
JCS 2022 Guideline Focused Update on Diagnosis and Treatment in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.《日本循环学会2022年稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者诊断与治疗指南重点更新》
Circ J. 2022 Apr 25;86(5):882-915. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-1041. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
2
Five-Year Outcomes After Fractional Flow Reserve-Based Deferral of Revascularization in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Final Results From the J-CONFIRM Registry.基于血流储备分数的慢性冠状动脉综合征血运重建延迟 5 年结果:J-CONFIRM 注册研究的最终结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;15(2):e011387. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011387. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
3
日本左主干冠状动脉疾病的最新经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Oct;39(4):386-402. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01030-4. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
4
Diagnostic Ability of Manual Calcification Length Assessment on Non-Electrocardiographically Gated Computed Tomography for Estimating the Presence of Coronary Artery Disease.非心电图门控计算机断层扫描手动钙化长度评估对冠状动脉疾病存在情况的诊断能力
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 12;13(8):2255. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082255.
5
Physiological Assessment with iFR prior to FFR Measurement in Left Main Disease.在左主干病变中,iFR 测量前的生理学评估。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Jul;39(3):241-251. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-00989-4. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
6
Diagnostic performance of pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve.压力限制下的冠状动脉血流储备的诊断性能。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Apr;39(2):164-172. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-00983-w. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
7
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Frame Count for Coronary Blood Flow Evaluation during Interventional Diagnostic Procedures.心肌梗死溶栓帧数用于介入诊断程序中冠状动脉血流评估。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 15;59(12):2185. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122185.
8
Prognostic Impact of Renal Function on 5-Year Outcomes After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Deferral of Revascularization.肾功能对血流储备分数指导的血运重建延迟后 5 年结局的预后影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e030886. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030886. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
9
FFR-CT is extremely useful in detecting hemodynamically significant left-main coronary artery stenosis with right coronary artery hypoplasia: A case report.血流储备分数CT在检测合并右冠状动脉发育不全的血流动力学显著的左主干冠状动脉狭窄方面极其有用:一例病例报告。
J Cardiol Cases. 2023 Jun 1;28(2):64-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2023.04.009. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Cardiovascular events in patients with deferred lesions and chronic kidney disease.慢性肾脏病伴延迟病变患者的心血管事件。
Heart Vessels. 2023 Nov;38(11):1364-1370. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02285-2. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
Association of guideline-directed medical therapy adherence with outcomes after fractional flow reserve-based deferral of revascularization.
基于血流储备分数的血运重建延迟后,指南指导的药物治疗依从性与预后的关联。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Sep 3;8(6):600-608. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac008.
4
JCS/JSCVS 2018 Guideline on Revascularization of Stable Coronary Artery Disease.《日本循环学会/日本心血管外科学会2018年稳定型冠状动脉疾病血运重建指南》
Circ J. 2022 Feb 25;86(3):477-588. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1282. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Instantaneous wave-free ratio compared with fractional flow reserve in PCI: A cost-minimization analysis.即刻无波比与血流储备分数在 PCI 中的比较:一项成本最小化分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Dec 1;344:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.09.054. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
6
Multivessel PCI Guided by FFR or Angiography for Myocardial Infarction.多支血管 PCI 血运重建:以血流储备分数(FFR)或血管造影为指导治疗心肌梗死。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 22;385(4):297-308. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104650. Epub 2021 May 16.
7
Comparisons of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios: Predicting Functional Results of Coronary Revascularization Using Longitudinal Vessel Interrogation.非充血压力比比较:使用纵向血管探查预测冠状动脉血运重建的功能结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 23;13(22):2688-2698. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.060. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
8
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios: Resting Full-Cycle Ratio, Diastolic Pressure Ratio, and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio.非充血压力比值的长期临床结果:静息全周期比值、舒张压比值和瞬时无波比值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep 15;9(18):e016818. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016818. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
9
Revascularization Deferral of Nonculprit Stenoses on the Basis of Fractional Flow Reserve: 1-Year Outcomes of 8,579 Patients.基于血流储备分数的非罪犯狭窄血运重建延迟:8579 例患者的 1 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug 24;13(16):1894-1903. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.05.024. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
10
The Impact of Coronary Physiology on Contemporary Clinical Decision Making.冠状动脉生理学对当代临床决策的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 27;13(14):1617-1638. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.040.