Castro-Carrera T, Frutos P, Leroux C, Chilliard Y, Hervás G, Belenguer A, Bernard L, Toral P G
1Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-ULE),Finca Marzanas s/n. 24346 Grulleros,León,Spain.
2INRA,UMR 1213 Herbivores,Equipe Alimentation Génomique Lactation,Site de Theix,F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle,France.
Animal. 2015 Apr;9(4):582-91. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002882. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
There are very few studies in ruminants characterizing mammary and adipose tissue (AT) expression of genes and gene networks for diets causing variations in milk fatty acid (FA) composition without altering milk fat secretion, and even less complementing this information with data on tissue FA profiles. This work was conducted in sheep in order to investigate the response of the mammary gland and the subcutaneous and perirenal AT, in terms of FA profile and mRNA abundance of genes involved in lipid metabolism, to a diet known to modify milk FA composition. Ten lactating Assaf ewes were randomly assigned to two treatments consisting of a total mixed ration based on alfalfa hay and a concentrate (60 : 40) supplemented with 0 (control diet) or 25 (SO diet) g of sunflower oil/kg of diet dry matter for 7 weeks. Milk composition, including FA profile, was analysed after 48 days on treatments. On day 49, the animals were euthanized and tissue samples were collected to analyse FA and mRNA abundance of 16 candidate genes. Feeding SO did not affect animal performance but modified milk FA composition. Major changes included decreases in the concentration of FA derived from de novo synthesis (e.g. 12:0, 14:0 and 16:0) and increases in that of long-chain FA (e.g. 18:0, c9-18:1, trans-18:1 isomers and c9,t11-CLA); however, they were not accompanied by significant variations in the mRNA abundance of the studied lipogenic genes (i.e. ACACA, FASN, LPL, CD36, FABP3, SCD1 and SCD5) and transcription factors (SREBF1 and PPARG), or in the constituent FA of mammary tissue. Regarding the FA composition of AT, the little influence of SO did not appear to be linked to changes in gene mRNA abundance (decreases of GPAM and SREBF1 in both tissues, and of PPARG in the subcutaneous depot). Similarly, the great variation between AT (higher contents of saturated FA and trans-18:1 isomers in the perirenal, and of cis-18:1, c9,t11-CLA and n-3 PUFA in the subcutaneous AT) could not be related to differences in gene mRNA abundance due to tissue site (higher LPL and CD36, and lower SREBF1 in perirenal than in subcutaneous AT). Overall, these results suggest a marginal contribution of gene expression to the nutritional regulation of lipid metabolism in these tissues, at least with the examined diets and after 7 weeks on treatments. It cannot be ruled out, however, that the response to SO is mediated by other genes or post-transcriptional mechanisms.
关于反刍动物,针对那些能引起乳脂肪酸(FA)组成变化但不改变乳脂肪分泌的日粮,很少有研究对乳腺和脂肪组织(AT)中的基因及基因网络表达进行表征,用组织FA谱数据补充此信息的研究更是少之又少。本研究以绵羊为对象,旨在探讨乳腺、皮下和肾周AT在FA谱以及参与脂质代谢的基因的mRNA丰度方面,对一种已知能改变乳FA组成的日粮的反应。十只泌乳期的阿萨福母羊被随机分为两组,分别给予基于苜蓿干草和精料(60:40)的全混合日粮,其中一组每千克日粮干物质补充0(对照日粮)或25(SO日粮)克向日葵油,为期7周。处理48天后分析乳成分,包括FA谱。在第49天,对动物实施安乐死并采集组织样本,以分析16个候选基因的FA和mRNA丰度。饲喂SO不影响动物生产性能,但改变了乳FA组成。主要变化包括源自从头合成的FA浓度降低(如12:0、14:0和16:0),长链FA浓度增加(如18:0、c9-18:1、反式-18:1异构体和c9,t11-CLA);然而,这些变化并未伴随着所研究的生脂基因(即ACACA、FASN、LPL、CD36、FABP3、SCD1和SCD5)和转录因子(SREBF1和PPARG)的mRNA丰度出现显著变化,也未引起乳腺组织中组成FA的显著变化。关于AT的FA组成,SO的影响较小,这似乎与基因mRNA丰度的变化无关(两种组织中GPAM和SREBF1降低,皮下脂肪库中PPARG降低)。同样,AT之间的巨大差异(肾周中饱和FA和反式-18:1异构体含量较高,皮下AT中顺式-18:1、c9,t11-CLA和n-3多不饱和脂肪酸含量较高)与因组织部位导致的基因mRNA丰度差异无关(肾周中LPL和CD36高于皮下AT,而SREBF1低于皮下AT)。总体而言,这些结果表明,至少在所研究的日粮及处理7周后,基因表达对这些组织中脂质代谢的营养调控作用微乎其微。然而,不能排除对SO的反应是由其他基因或转录后机制介导的可能性。