• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨后退下颌术后与固定方法相关的骨骼稳定性及髁突位置

Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

作者信息

Roh Young-Chea, Shin Sang-Hun, Kim Seong-Sik, Sandor George K, Kim Yong-Deok

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan, South Korea.

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan, South Korea.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;42(8):1958-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2014.08.008
PMID:25441865
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate postoperative intersegmental displacement and relapse following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) by comparing three different fixation methods: group A (sliding plate), group B (miniplate) and group C (bicortical screws).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present retrospective study included 55 patients with mandibular prognathism who were treated with BSSRO. To evaluate skeletal changes, cone-beam computed tomography was taken before surgery (T0), three days after surgery (T1), and 6 months after surgery (T2). Differences among the three groups were assessed using a one-way analysis of variance, where P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the three groups in demographic data and the amount of mandibular setback. In skeletal changes and condylar axis changes, there were no statistically significant differences among the three groups. However, there were statistically significant postoperative skeletal changes in group C (bicortical screws) at all landmarks. The mean horizontal relapse rate was 1.9% in group A (sliding plate); 4.8% in group B (miniplate); and 15.4% in group C (bicortical screws).

CONCLUSION

The sliding plate system has good adaptability to the proximal segment after mandibular setback with BSSRO, and behaves according to semi-rigid fixation principles.

摘要

目的

通过比较三种不同的固定方法:A组(滑动钢板)、B组(微型钢板)和C组(双皮质螺钉),研究双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨术(BSSRO)术后节段间移位和复发情况。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究纳入了55例接受BSSRO治疗的下颌前突患者。为评估骨骼变化,在术前(T0)、术后3天(T1)和术后6个月(T2)进行锥形束计算机断层扫描。采用单因素方差分析评估三组之间的差异,P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

三组在人口统计学数据和下颌后缩量方面无显著差异。在骨骼变化和髁突轴变化方面,三组之间无统计学显著差异。然而,C组(双皮质螺钉)在所有标志点均有统计学显著的术后骨骼变化。A组(滑动钢板)的平均水平复发率为1.9%;B组(微型钢板)为4.8%;C组(双皮质螺钉)为15.4%。

结论

滑动钢板系统对BSSRO下颌后缩后的近端节段具有良好的适应性,并按照半刚性固定原则发挥作用。

相似文献

1
Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨后退下颌术后与固定方法相关的骨骼稳定性及髁突位置
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;42(8):1958-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
2
Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.髁突矢状劈开截骨术后双侧可吸收皮质骨螺钉与钛钉固定下颌前突的骨稳定性比较研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):660-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
3
Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparison between the hybrid technique for fixation and the conventional plate fixation using an absorbable plate and screws.下颌后缩手术后的骨骼稳定性:使用可吸收板和螺钉的混合固定技术与传统钢板固定的比较。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jun;42(4):351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
4
Evaluation of intersegmental displacement according to osteosynthesis method for mandibular setback sagittal split ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomographic superimposition.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描叠加技术,根据下颌骨矢状劈开截骨后退术的接骨术方法评估节段间移位情况。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;70(12):2893-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
5
Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?接受双颌手术治疗的患者相比接受单颌手术的患者,其髁突位置更稳定吗?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Sep;70(9):2143-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.028. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
6
Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.通过锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌前徙联合Le Fort I截骨术的双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨术后髁突位置的短期和长期变化。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Nov;71(11):1956-66. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.06.213. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
7
Obwegeser II osteotomy (transoral angle osteotomy) for open bite with skeletal class III deformity.用于治疗伴有骨性Ⅲ类错畸形的开的Obwegeser II截骨术(经口角部截骨术)
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;42(7):1382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.03.030. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
8
Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment.下颌后缩运动行下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后的复发与下颌后缩量及近端骨块术中顺时针旋转的关系
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;42(6):811-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
9
Effect of intended manual condylar positioning on skeletal and dental changes in Skeletal Class III deformities: CBCT-generated half-cephalograms.基于 CBCT 生成的半头颅侧位片研究髁突理想位置定位对骨性 III 类错(牙合)畸形患者骨骼和牙齿变化的影响
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;42(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.031. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
10
Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement.下颌前徙矢状劈开截骨术后三种坚固内固定技术的术后稳定性比较
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;42(5):e224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Mandibular Fixation Techniques Using Monocortical Plates After Mandibular Setback Surgery.下颌后缩手术后使用单皮质板的下颌固定技术评估
Life (Basel). 2025 May 23;15(6):845. doi: 10.3390/life15060845.
2
Post-BSSO condylar position stability: a comparison of miniplate and lag screw fixation.髁突切除术后髁突位置稳定性:微型钢板与拉力螺钉固定的比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04499-w.
3
The effect of tongue reduction for preventing adverse effects in patients undergoing class III orthognathic surgery: a three-dimensional comparative analysis.
舌骨降肌术预防 III 类正颌手术不良影响的效果:三维对比分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Feb 21;28(3):162. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05554-0.
4
Clinical Stability of Bespoke Snowman Plates for Fixation following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy of the Mandible.定制雪人钢板在下颌骨矢状劈开截骨术后固定的临床稳定性
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Aug 1;10(8):914. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10080914.
5
Changes in condylar position during orthodontic treatment depending on the amount of incisor retraction: a cone-beam computed tomography study.基于切牙内收量的不同,正畸治疗中髁突位置的变化:一项锥形束 CT 研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Sep;27(9):5297-5307. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05149-1. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
6
Semi-Rigid Fixation Using a Sliding Plate for Treating Fractures of the Mandibular Condylar Process.使用滑动钢板进行半刚性固定治疗下颌髁突骨折
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 10;10(24):5782. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245782.
7
Skeletal Stability after Mandibular Setback via Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Verse Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.经矢状劈开下颌支截骨术与口内垂直下颌支截骨术后退下颌后骨骼稳定性:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 26;10(21):4950. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214950.
8
The Anatomical Basis for Plate Fixation in BSSO to Minimize Condylar Torquing: A Comparative CT Study of Mandibular Advancement and Setback.双颌前徙术中钢板固定以最小化髁突扭转的解剖学基础:下颌前徙和后退的CT对比研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021 Sep;20(3):432-438. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01564-7. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
9
Mandibular condyle displacements after orthognathic surgery-an overview of quantitative studies.正颌外科手术后下颌髁突移位——定量研究综述
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Apr;11(4):1628-1650. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-677.
10
Analysis of Sagittal Position Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Across the Four Different Types of Plating Systems.四种不同接骨板系统下颌后退术后髁突矢状位置变化的分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Oct 1;32(7):2441-2445. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007578.