Suppr超能文献

中央型与周围型肺癌立体定向体部放射治疗后的毒性反应:一项倾向评分匹配对分析。

Toxicity after central versus peripheral lung stereotactic body radiation therapy: a propensity score matched-pair analysis.

作者信息

Mangona Victor S, Aneese Andrew M, Marina Ovidiu, Hymas Richard V, Ionascu Dan, Robertson John M, Gallardo Lori J, Grills Inga Siiner

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan.

Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jan 1;91(1):124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.08.345. Epub 2014 Oct 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare toxicity after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for "central" tumors-within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree or with planning tumor volume (PTV) touching mediastinum-versus noncentral ("peripheral") lung tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From November 2005 to January 2011, 229 tumors (110 central, 119 peripheral; T1-3N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer and limited lung metastases) in 196 consecutive patients followed prospectively at a single institution received moderate-dose SBRT (48-60 Gy in 4-5 fractions [biologic effective dose=100-132 Gy, α/β=10]) using 4-dimensional planning, online image-guided radiation therapy, and institutional dose constraints. Clinical adverse events (AEs) were graded prospectively at clinical and radiographic follow-up using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Pulmonary function test (PFT) decline was graded as 2 (25%-49.9% decline), 3 (50.0%-74.9% decline), or 4 (≥75.0% decline). Central/peripheral location was assessed retrospectively on planning CT scans. Groups were compared after propensity score matching. Characteristics were compared with χ(2) and 2-tailed t tests, adverse events with χ(2) test-for-trend, and cumulative incidence using competing risks analysis (Gray's test).

RESULTS

With 79 central and 79 peripheral tumors matched, no differences in AEs were observed after 17 months median follow-up. Two-year cumulative incidences of grade ≥2 pain, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, and skin AEs were 14%, 5%, 6%, and 10% (central) versus 19%, 10%, 10%, and 3% (peripheral), respectively (P=.31, .38, .70, and .09). Grade ≥2 cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system AEs were rare (<1%). Two-year incidences of grade ≥2 clinical AEs (28% vs 25%, P=.79), grade ≥2 PFT decline (36% vs 34%, P=.94), grade ≥3 clinical AEs (3% vs 7%, P=.48), and grade ≥3 PFT decline (0 vs 10%, P=.11) were similar for central versus peripheral tumors, respectively. Pooled 2-year incidences of grades 4 and 5 AEs were <1% and 0%, respectively, in both the prematched and matched groups.

CONCLUSION

Moderate-dose SBRT with these techniques yields a similarly safe toxicity profile for both central and peripheral lung tumors.

摘要

目的

比较立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)用于“中央型”肿瘤(位于近端支气管树2 cm范围内或计划靶体积[PTV]与纵隔接触)与非中央型(“外周型”)肺肿瘤后的毒性。

方法和材料

2005年11月至2011年1月,在单一机构前瞻性随访的196例连续患者中的229个肿瘤(110个中央型,119个外周型;T1 - 3N0M0非小细胞肺癌和局限性肺转移瘤)接受了中等剂量SBRT(48 - 60 Gy,分4 - 5次照射[生物等效剂量 = 100 - 132 Gy,α/β = 10]),采用四维计划、在线图像引导放射治疗和机构剂量限制。临床不良事件(AE)在临床和影像学随访时使用不良事件通用术语标准3.0进行前瞻性分级。肺功能测试(PFT)下降分为2级(下降25% - 49.9%)、3级(下降50.0% - 74.9%)或4级(下降≥75.0%)。中央/外周位置在计划CT扫描上进行回顾性评估。在倾向评分匹配后比较各组。特征采用χ²检验和双尾t检验进行比较,不良事件采用χ²趋势检验进行比较,累积发病率采用竞争风险分析(Gray检验)。

结果

匹配79个中央型和79个外周型肿瘤后,中位随访17个月未观察到不良事件有差异。≥2级疼痛、肌肉骨骼、肺部和皮肤不良事件的两年累积发生率分别为14%、5%、6%和10%(中央型)与19%、10%、10%和3%(外周型)(P = 0.31、0.38、0.70和0.09)。≥2级心血管、胃肠道和中枢神经系统不良事件罕见(<1%)。中央型与外周型肿瘤≥2级临床不良事件的两年发生率(28%对25%,P = 0.79)、≥2级PFT下降的两年发生率(36%对34%,P = 0.94)、≥3级临床不良事件的两年发生率(3%对7%,P = 0.48)以及≥3级PFT下降的两年发生率(0对10%,P = 0.11)分别相似。在预匹配组和匹配组中,4级和5级不良事件的合并两年发生率分别<1%和0%。

结论

采用这些技术的中等剂量SBRT对中央型和外周型肺肿瘤产生的毒性特征同样安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验