Fernandez Felix G, Khullar Onkar, Force Seth D, Jiang Renjian, Pickens Allan, Howard David, Ward Kevin, Gillespie Theresa
Section of General Thoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Section of General Thoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jan;99(1):292-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.052. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions are costly and associated with inferior patient outcomes. There is limited knowledge related to readmissions after esophagectomy for malignancy. Our aim was to determine the impact on survival of readmission after esophagectomy. METHODS: This cohort study utilizes Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data (2002 to 2009). Survival, length of stay, 30-day readmissions, and discharge disposition were determined. Multivariate logistic regression models were created to examine risk factors associated with readmission. RESULTS: In all, 1,744 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy: 80% of patients (1,390) were male, and mean age was 73 years; 71.8% of tumors (1,251) were adenocarcinomas, and 72.5% (1,265) were distal esophageal tumors; 38% of patients (667) received induction therapy. Operative approach was transthoracic in 52.6% of patients (918) and transhiatal in 37.4% (653), and required complex reconstruction (intestinal interposition) in 9.9% (173). Stage distribution was as follows: stage I, 35.3% (616); stage II, 32.5% (566); stage III, 27.9% (487); and stage IV, 2.3% (40). Median length of stay was 13 days, hospital mortality was 9.3% (158 patients), and 30-day readmission rate was 18.6% (212 of 1,139 home discharges); 25.4% of patients (443) were discharged to institutional care facilities. Overall survival was significantly worse for patients who were readmitted (p < 0.0001, log rank test). Risk factors for readmission were comorbidity score of 3+, urgent admission, and urban residence. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital readmissions after esophagectomy for cancer occur frequently and are associated with worse survival. Improved identification of patients at risk for readmission after esophagectomy can inform patient selection, discharge planning, and outpatient monitoring. Optimization of such practices may lead to improved outcomes at reduced cost.
背景:医院再入院成本高昂且与患者不良预后相关。关于恶性肿瘤食管切除术后再入院的相关知识有限。我们的目的是确定食管切除术后再入院对生存的影响。 方法:这项队列研究利用了监测、流行病学和最终结果 - 医疗保险数据(2002年至2009年)。确定了生存率、住院时间、30天再入院率和出院处置情况。创建了多变量逻辑回归模型以检查与再入院相关的风险因素。 结果:共有1744例食管癌患者接受了食管切除术:80%的患者(1390例)为男性,平均年龄为73岁;71.8%的肿瘤(1251例)为腺癌,72.5%(1265例)为食管远端肿瘤;38%的患者(667例)接受了诱导治疗。52.6%的患者(918例)采用经胸手术入路,37.4%(653例)采用经裂孔手术入路,9.9%(173例)需要复杂重建(肠代食管)。分期分布如下:I期,35.3%(616例);II期,32.5%(566例);III期,27.9%(487例);IV期,2.3%(40例)。中位住院时间为13天,医院死亡率为9.3%(158例患者),30天再入院率为18.6%(1139例出院回家患者中的212例);25.4%的患者(443例)出院至机构护理设施。再入院患者的总体生存率明显更差(p < 0.0001,对数秩检验)。再入院的风险因素为合并症评分为3+、紧急入院和城市居住。 结论:癌症食管切除术后医院再入院频繁发生且与较差的生存率相关。改进对食管切除术后再入院风险患者的识别可为患者选择、出院计划和门诊监测提供参考。优化此类做法可能以降低成本改善预后。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015-5
J Clin Oncol. 2015-2-10
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018-1-31
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025-8-7
Neurosurgery. 2022-9-1
J Thorac Dis. 2021-8
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013-12-21
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013-9-25
N Engl J Med. 2013-9-19
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013-3-7
J Am Coll Surg. 2012-6-21
J Am Coll Surg. 2011-8-16
N Engl J Med. 2011-6-2