Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Dec;28(8):836-44. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
The potentially detrimental effects of safety behaviors during exposure therapy are still subject to debate. Empirical findings are inconsistent, and few studies have investigated effects of idiosyncratic safety behavior manifestations during exposure or in everyday life. These limitations might be due to a lack of appropriate measures that address individual safety behaviors. We examined psychometric properties and predictive value of the Texas Safety Maneuver Scale (TSMS), a questionnaire specifically targeting safety behaviors in panic disorder and agoraphobia. Effects of safety behavior use, both during everyday life and during therapy, were examined using data from a multicenter RCT of N=268 patients that aimed at evaluating efficacy and mechanisms of action of two variants of an exposure-based therapy. The TSMS total score demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.89), and it showed significant correlations with selected measures of baseline anxiety and impairment. The proposed factor structure could not be replicated. Frequent safety behavior use at baseline was associated with actual safety behavior during exposure exercises. Pronounced in-situ safety behavior, but not baseline safety behavior was associated to detrimental treatment outcome. The results underline the relevance of a rigorous safety behavior assessment in therapy. The actual relationship between safety behavior use and treatment outcome is yet to determine.
在暴露疗法中,安全行为可能产生的有害影响仍存在争议。实证研究结果不一致,很少有研究调查过在暴露或日常生活中表现出的特殊安全行为的影响。这些局限性可能是由于缺乏针对个体安全行为的适当措施。我们研究了德克萨斯安全行为量表(TSMS)的心理测量特性和预测价值,该量表是专门针对恐慌症和广场恐惧症中的安全行为的问卷。使用一项多中心 RCT 的数据,该 RCT 共纳入了 268 名患者,旨在评估两种基于暴露的治疗方法的疗效和作用机制,对日常和治疗期间的安全行为使用的影响进行了研究。TSMS 的总分表现出良好的内部一致性(α=0.89),并且与基线焦虑和障碍的特定测量指标呈显著相关。提出的因子结构无法复制。基线时频繁的安全行为使用与暴露练习中的实际安全行为有关。明显的现场安全行为,而不是基线安全行为与治疗效果不佳有关。结果强调了在治疗中进行严格的安全行为评估的重要性。安全行为的使用与治疗结果之间的实际关系仍有待确定。