Ickes Melinda, Gokun Yevgeniya, Rayens Mary Kay, Hahn Ellen J
Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
Tobacco Policy Research Program, College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2015 Mar;16(2):210-7. doi: 10.1177/1524839914561060. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
Despite potential benefits of tobacco-free campus policies, compliance remains a challenge. Observational measures hold the most promise in determining compliance with these policies. There is need for further study to determine validity of observational measures of compliance with tobacco-free campus policies. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of two observational measures of compliance with a tobacco-free campus policy: direct observation of violators and cigarette butts. Data collection took place over a 1-year time period. Direct observation was operationally defined as the number of observed violators in hot spots. A cigarette butt protocol previously found to be reliable was used to count the number of butts in campus hot spots. Results indicated a positive relationship between number of violators observed per visit and number of cigarette butts collected. Although most of the hot spots exhibited two or fewer violators per visit and 100 butts or fewer per collection, the data points outside this range supported a positive association between observed violators per visit and cigarette butts. The findings support that direct observation of violators is a valid measure of compliance compared to cigarette butts. Given available resources, using one or the other as evaluation measures is warranted.
尽管无烟校园政策有潜在益处,但合规性仍是一项挑战。观察性措施在确定这些政策的合规性方面最具前景。需要进一步研究以确定无烟校园政策合规性观察性措施的有效性。本研究的目的是确定两种无烟校园政策合规性观察性措施的有效性:对违规者的直接观察和烟头计数。数据收集历时1年。直接观察在操作上定义为在热点区域观察到的违规者数量。使用先前发现可靠的烟头计数方案来统计校园热点区域的烟头数量。结果表明每次访问观察到的违规者数量与收集到的烟头数量之间呈正相关。尽管大多数热点区域每次访问的违规者为两名或更少,每次收集的烟头为100个或更少,但超出此范围的数据点支持每次访问观察到的违规者与烟头之间存在正相关。研究结果支持,与烟头计数相比,对违规者的直接观察是一种有效的合规性衡量方法。鉴于现有资源,有必要使用其中一种作为评估措施。