Suppr超能文献

在主动反馈学习和观察性反馈学习中,与动作相关而非与刺激相关的预测误差的处理方式有所不同。

Processing of action- but not stimulus-related prediction errors differs between active and observational feedback learning.

作者信息

Kobza Stefan, Bellebaum Christian

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany.

Institute for Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;66:75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.036. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

Abstract

Learning of stimulus-response-outcome associations is driven by outcome prediction errors (PEs). Previous studies have shown larger PE-dependent activity in the striatum for learning from own as compared to observed actions and the following outcomes despite comparable learning rates. We hypothesised that this finding relates primarily to a stronger integration of action and outcome information in active learners. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated brain activations related to action-dependent PEs, reflecting the deviation between action values and obtained outcomes, and action-independent PEs, reflecting the deviation between subjective values of response-preceding cues and obtained outcomes. To this end, 16 active and 15 observational learners engaged in a probabilistic learning card-guessing paradigm. On each trial, active learners saw one out of five cues and pressed either a left or right response button to receive feedback (monetary win or loss). Each observational learner observed exactly those cues, responses and outcomes of one active learner. Learning performance was assessed in active test trials without feedback and did not differ between groups. For both types of PEs, activations were found in the globus pallidus, putamen, cerebellum, and insula in active learners. However, only for action-dependent PEs, activations in these structures and the anterior cingulate were increased in active relative to observational learners. Thus, PE-related activity in the reward system is not generally enhanced in active relative to observational learning but only for action-dependent PEs. For the cerebellum, additional activations were found across groups for cue-related uncertainty, thereby emphasising the cerebellum's role in stimulus-outcome learning.

摘要

对刺激-反应-结果关联的学习是由结果预测误差(PEs)驱动的。先前的研究表明,尽管学习速率相当,但与观察到的动作及后续结果相比,纹状体中与基于自身动作学习的PE相关的活动更为强烈。我们推测,这一发现主要与主动学习者中动作和结果信息的更强整合有关。我们使用功能磁共振成像,研究了与动作依赖型PE(反映动作值与获得结果之间的偏差)和动作独立型PE(反映反应前线索的主观值与获得结果之间的偏差)相关的大脑激活情况。为此,16名主动学习者和15名观察学习者参与了概率学习猜牌范式。在每次试验中,主动学习者看到五个线索中的一个,并按下左或右反应按钮以获得反馈(金钱输赢)。每个观察学习者准确观察一名主动学习者的那些线索、反应和结果。在无反馈的主动测试试验中评估学习表现,两组之间没有差异。对于两种类型的PE,在主动学习者的苍白球、壳核、小脑和脑岛中均发现激活。然而,仅对于动作依赖型PE,相对于观察学习者,主动学习者在这些结构和前扣带回中的激活增加。因此,相对于观察学习,奖励系统中与PE相关的活动在主动学习中并非普遍增强,而仅对于动作依赖型PE增强。对于小脑,在两组中均发现与线索相关的不确定性的额外激活,从而强调了小脑在刺激-结果学习中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验