Beucher G, Dolley P, Stewart Z, Lavoué V, Deffieux X, Dreyfus M
Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, CHU de Caen, avenue Côte-de-Nacre, 14033 Caen cedex 9, France.
Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, CHU de Caen, avenue Côte-de-Nacre, 14033 Caen cedex 9, France.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014 Dec;43(10):794-811. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
To assess early and late benefits and harms of different management options for first trimester miscarriage and for induction of labor and obtaining of uterine vacuity in case of fetal death beyond of 14weeks of gestation.
French and English publications were searched using PubMed and Cochrane Library.
Concerning missed miscarriage, expectant management is not recommended (LE1) because it increases the risk of failure, need of unplanned surgical procedure and blood transfusion (LE1). Surgical uterine evacuation remains more effective than medical treatment using misoprostol (LE1), but both techniques involve rare and comparable risks (EL1). When chosen, medical treatment should be a vaginal dose of 800μg of misoprostol, possibly repeated 24 to 48hours later (EL2). Administration of mifepristone prior to misoprostol is not recommended (EL2). In case of incomplete miscarriage, expectant management can be offered because it does not increase the risk of complications, neither haemorrhagic nor infectious (EL1). Medical treatment using misoprostol is not recommended (EL2) because it does not improve the evacuation rate when compared to our first option, and does not reduce the risk of complications (EL2). Surgical uterine evacuation leads to high evacuation rate (97-98%) and low risk of complications, haemorrhagic and infectious (<5%) (EL1). However, this option should not be the only one because of the good efficiency of the expectant management (more than 75% of evacuation) and comparably low risk of complications (EL1). Surgical aspiration should be favoured to curettage because it is quicker, less painful and leads to less bleeding (EL2). After a first trimester miscarriage future fertility is identical with each treatment (EL2). When a trophoblastic retention is suspected, a diagnostic hysteroscopy is recommended (EL2). In case of late intrauterine foetal death beyond 14weeks of gestation and without a past caesarean section, the most efficient protocol seems to be vaginal administration of misoprostol 200 to 400μg every 4 to 6hours (EL2). Twenty-four hours prior to misoprostol the administration of 200mg of mifepristone is recommended (EL3) because it improves the induction-expulsion time and diminishes the quantity of needed misoprostol (and so the complications linked to it) (EL3).
评估孕早期流产以及妊娠14周后胎儿死亡时引产及清空子宫的不同处理方式的早期和晚期益处及危害。
通过PubMed和Cochrane图书馆检索法语和英语出版物。
关于稽留流产,不推荐期待治疗(证据等级1),因为它会增加失败风险、计划外手术及输血需求(证据等级1)。手术清宫仍然比使用米索前列醇的药物治疗更有效(证据等级1),但两种技术的罕见风险相当(证据等级1)。若选择药物治疗,应为阴道给予800μg米索前列醇,可能在24至48小时后重复给药(证据等级2)。不推荐在米索前列醇之前给予米非司酮(证据等级2)。对于不全流产,可以采用期待治疗,因为它不会增加出血或感染并发症的风险(证据等级1)。不推荐使用米索前列醇进行药物治疗(证据等级2),因为与首选方案相比,它不能提高清宫率,也不能降低并发症风险(证据等级2)。手术清宫导致清宫率高(97 - 98%),出血和感染并发症风险低(<5%)(证据等级1)。然而,由于期待治疗效果良好(清宫率超过75%)且并发症风险相当低(证据等级1),该方案不应是唯一选择。应优先选择手术吸宫而非刮宫,因为它更快、疼痛更少且出血更少(证据等级2)。孕早期流产后,每种治疗方式对未来生育能力的影响相同(证据等级2)。当怀疑有滋养细胞残留时,推荐进行诊断性宫腔镜检查(证据等级2)。对于妊娠14周后发生的晚期宫内胎儿死亡且既往无剖宫产史的情况,最有效的方案似乎是每4至6小时阴道给予200至400μg米索前列醇(证据等级2)。在使用米索前列醇前24小时,推荐给予200mg米非司酮(证据等级3),因为它能缩短引产 - 排出时间并减少所需米索前列醇的用量(以及与之相关的并发症)(证据等级3)。