Center of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers University, 607 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8001, USA; Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, 152 Freylinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.
Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, 152 Freylinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar 3;57:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
The present experiment evaluated the effects of the Number of Cagemates (0 vs 1 vs 2) on home cage ethanol drinking during Proximal Cagemate Drinking (PCD) procedures in Male and Female CD-1 mice. Continuous-access home cage 2-bottle (ethanol vs. water) free-choice procedures were employed. PCD procedures eliminate the distracting effects of direct physical contact between Drinkers and their Cagemates on ethanol drinking by imposing a translucent plastic barrier strip between them. If direct physical contact distracts from drinking, then one Cagemate would drink more ethanol and more water than two Cagemates housed together on the same side of the barrier. This would be the case even if two Cagemates stimulated more ethanol drinking in the Drinker housed on the other side of the barrier, due to the social stimulation effects of additional Cagemates. Results revealed that the ethanol intake of Female Drinkers was directly related to the number of Cagemates on the other side of the barrier strip, but this social stimulation effect was not observed in Male Drinkers. For Male Cagemates and Female Cagemates, the single Cagemate provided elevated ethanol intake and elevated water intake relative to the ethanol intake and water intake of each Cagemate in the two Cagemates condition. The data revealed that direct physical contact between Cagemates reduced their ethanol intake, even while stimulating ethanol intake of the Drinker on the other side of the barrier, indicating that the effects of social stimulation on ethanol drinking are not entirely due to effects of modeling or peer pressure. The PCD procedures allow the evaluation of effects of a broad range of social factors on home cage ethanol drinking in mice.
本实验评估了笼伴数量(0、1、2)对雄性和雌性 CD-1 小鼠近端笼伴饮酒(PCD)程序中自笼内乙醇饮用量的影响。采用连续自由选择的自笼内 2 瓶(乙醇与水)程序。PCD 程序通过在饮者和其笼伴之间施加透明塑料隔离带,消除了直接身体接触对饮酒的干扰作用。如果直接的身体接触分散了饮酒的注意力,那么与共同饲养在同一隔离带一侧的两个笼伴相比,一个笼伴会饮用更多的乙醇和水。即使两个笼伴通过额外的笼伴刺激了位于隔离带另一侧的饮者更多的乙醇摄入,情况也会如此,因为这是额外笼伴的社交刺激效应。结果表明,雌性饮者的乙醇摄入量与隔离带另一侧的笼伴数量直接相关,但在雄性饮者中未观察到这种社交刺激效应。对于雄性笼伴和雌性笼伴来说,与在两个笼伴条件下的每个笼伴的乙醇摄入量和水摄入量相比,单一笼伴提供了更高的乙醇摄入量和更高的水摄入量。数据表明,笼伴之间的直接身体接触减少了它们的乙醇摄入量,即使这同时刺激了隔离带另一侧饮者的乙醇摄入量,这表明社交刺激对乙醇摄入的影响并非完全归因于模仿或同伴压力的影响。PCD 程序允许评估广泛的社会因素对小鼠自笼内乙醇摄入的影响。