Suppr超能文献

在连续流血液泵时代,搏动性重要吗?

Does pulsatility matter in the era of continuous-flow blood pumps?

作者信息

Moazami Nader, Dembitsky Walter P, Adamson Robert, Steffen Robert J, Soltesz Edward G, Starling Randall C, Fukamachi Kiyotaka

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, California.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Aug;34(8):999-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

Abstract

Despite significant improved survival with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), complications related to aortic valve insufficiency, gastrointestinal bleeding, stroke, pump thrombosis, and hemolysis have dampened the long term success of these pumps. Evolution has favored a pulsatile heart pump to be able to deliver the maximum flow at different levels of systemic vascular resistance, confer kinetic energy to the flow of blood past areas of stenosis and generate low shear stress on blood elements. In this perspective, we suggest that lack of pulsatility may be one factor that has limited the success of continuous flow LVADs and suggest that research needs to focus on methods to generate pulsatility either by the native heart or by various speed modulation algorithms.

摘要

尽管持续血流左心室辅助装置(LVADs)显著提高了生存率,但与主动脉瓣关闭不全、胃肠道出血、中风、泵血栓形成和溶血相关的并发症阻碍了这些泵的长期成功。进化青睐搏动性心脏泵,使其能够在不同水平的全身血管阻力下输送最大流量,赋予流经狭窄区域的血流动能,并在血液成分上产生低剪切应力。从这个角度来看,我们认为缺乏搏动性可能是限制持续血流LVADs成功的一个因素,并建议研究需要专注于通过天然心脏或各种速度调制算法来产生搏动性的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验