Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Exercise Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2021 Apr 1;320(4):R425-R437. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00274.2020. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
Vascular function is further attenuated in patients with chronic heart failure implanted with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD), likely due to decreased arterial pulsatility, and this may contribute to LVAD-associated cardiovascular complications. However, the impact of increasing pulsatility on vascular function in this population is unknown. Therefore, 15 LVAD recipients and 15 well-matched controls underwent a 45-min, unilateral, arm pulsatility treatment, evoked by intermittent cuff inflation/deflation (2-s duty cycle), distal to the elbow. Vascular function was assessed by percent brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (%FMD) and reactive hyperemia (RH) (Doppler ultrasound). Pretreatment, %FMD (LVAD: 4.0 ± 1.7; controls: 4.2 ± 1.4%) and RH (LVAD: 340 ± 101; controls: 308 ± 94 mL) were not different between LVAD recipients and controls; however, %FMD/shear rate was attenuated (LVAD: 0.10 ± 0.04; controls: 0.17 ± 0.06%/s, < 0.05). The LVAD recipients exhibited a significantly attenuated pulsatility index (PI) compared with controls prior to treatment (LVAD: 2 ± 2; controls: 15 ± 7 AU, < 0.05); however, during the treatment, PI was no longer different (LVAD: 37 ± 38; controls: 36 ± 14 AU). Although time to peak dilation and RH were not altered by the pulsatility treatment, %FMD (LVAD: 7.0 ± 1.8; controls: 7.4 ± 2.6%) and %FMD/shear rate (LVAD: 0.19 ± 0.07; controls: 0.33 ± 0.15%/s) increased significantly in both groups, with, importantly, %FMD/shear rate in the LVAD recipients being restored to that of the controls pretreatment. This study documents that a localized pulsatility treatment in LVAD recipients and controls can recover local vascular function, an important precursor to the development of approaches to increase systemic pulsatility and reduce systemic vascular complications in LVAD recipients.
血管功能在植入持续血流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的慢性心力衰竭患者中进一步减弱,可能是由于动脉搏动性降低所致,这可能导致 LVAD 相关心血管并发症。然而,在该人群中增加搏动性对血管功能的影响尚不清楚。因此,15 名 LVAD 接受者和 15 名匹配良好的对照者接受了 45 分钟的单侧手臂搏动性治疗,通过间歇性袖带充气/放气(2 秒占空比)在肘部远端诱发。血管功能通过肱动脉血流介导的扩张(% FMD)和反应性充血(RH)(超声多普勒)评估。在治疗前,% FMD(LVAD:4.0 ± 1.7;对照组:4.2 ± 1.4%)和 RH(LVAD:340 ± 101;对照组:308 ± 94 mL)在 LVAD 接受者和对照组之间没有差异;然而,% FMD/剪切率降低(LVAD:0.10 ± 0.04;对照组:0.17 ± 0.06%/s, < 0.05)。与对照组相比,LVAD 接受者在治疗前的搏动指数(PI)明显降低(LVAD:2 ± 2;对照组:15 ± 7 AU, < 0.05);然而,在治疗期间,PI 不再不同(LVAD:37 ± 38;对照组:36 ± 14 AU)。尽管峰值扩张和 RH 的时间不受搏动性治疗的影响,但% FMD(LVAD:7.0 ± 1.8;对照组:7.4 ± 2.6%)和% FMD/剪切率(LVAD:0.19 ± 0.07;对照组:0.33 ± 0.15%/s)在两组中均显著增加,重要的是,LVAD 接受者的% FMD/剪切率恢复到治疗前的对照组水平。本研究表明,LVAD 接受者和对照组的局部搏动性治疗可以恢复局部血管功能,这是增加 LVAD 接受者全身搏动性和减少全身血管并发症方法的重要前提。