Morita Sumio, Mizuno Yuji, Harada Eisaku, Nakagawa Hitoshi, Morikawa Yoshinobu, Saito Yoshihiko, Katoh Daisuke, Kashiwagi Yusuke, Yoshimura Michihiro, Murohara Toyoaki, Yasue Hirofumi
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kumamoto Kinoh Hospital, Kumamoto Aging Research Institute, Japan.
Intern Med. 2014;53(23):2663-70. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.53.2705. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
Objective Coronary spasm as well as atherosclerosis plays an important role in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease. However, the relationship between coronary spasm and atherosclerosis is not well known. The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences and interactions between risk factors for coronary spasm and atherosclerosis and thereby explore the pathogenesis of coronary spasm. Methods The study subjects consisted of 938 patients with chest discomfort (522 men and 416 women, mean age 65.2±11.0) who underwent intracoronary-acetylcholine provocation tests for coronary spasm. Coronary risk factors, including age, gender, body mass index, blood pressure, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), white blood cells, glucose, lipid profiles, and other laboratory chemistries were examined. Results Four hundred and ninety-six patients (315 men and 181 women, mean age: 65.1±11.4) were diagnosed with coronary spastic angina (CSA), while the remaining 442 patients (207 men and 235 women, mean age: 65.3±10.7) were diagnosed with non-CSA. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed men, smoking, hsCRP, and low diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to be predictors (p=0.001, p=0.009, p=0.034, and p=0.041, respectively) for CSA, while age, diabetes mellitus, low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, systolic blood pressure (SBP), uric acid and male gender were found to be predictors (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.002, p=0.006 and p=0.029, respectively) for atherosclerosis. Conclusion Predictors for coronary spasm were smoking, hsCRP and low DBP, whereas those for atherosclerosis were age, diabetes mellitus, high SBP, and uric acid in that order. These findings suggest that the pathogenesis of coronary spasm differs from that of atherosclerosis.
目的 冠状动脉痉挛以及动脉粥样硬化在冠心病发病机制中均起重要作用。然而,冠状动脉痉挛与动脉粥样硬化之间的关系尚不明确。本研究旨在探讨冠状动脉痉挛和动脉粥样硬化危险因素之间的差异及相互作用,从而探究冠状动脉痉挛的发病机制。方法 研究对象包括938例有胸部不适的患者(男性522例,女性416例,平均年龄65.2±11.0岁),这些患者均接受了冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱激发试验以检测冠状动脉痉挛。检测冠状动脉危险因素,包括年龄、性别、体重指数、血压、高敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)、白细胞、血糖、血脂谱以及其他实验室检查指标。结果 496例患者(男性315例,女性181例,平均年龄:65.1±11.4岁)被诊断为冠状动脉痉挛性心绞痛(CSA),其余442例患者(男性207例,女性235例,平均年龄:65.3±10.7岁)被诊断为非CSA。多因素logistic回归分析显示,男性、吸烟、hsCRP以及低舒张压(DBP)是CSA的预测因素(p值分别为0.001、0.009、0.034和0.041),而年龄、糖尿病、低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、收缩压(SBP)、尿酸以及男性性别是动脉粥样硬化的预测因素(p值分别<0.001、<0.001、<0.001、0.002、0.006和0.029)。结论 冠状动脉痉挛的预测因素依次为吸烟、hsCRP和低DBP,而动脉粥样硬化的预测因素依次为年龄、糖尿病、高SBP和尿酸。这些发现提示冠状动脉痉挛的发病机制与动脉粥样硬化不同。