Thur K E, Nelson A J D, Cassaday H J
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2014 Dec;127:42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
The evidence for cognitively enhancing effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine6 (5-HT6) receptor antagonists such as Ro 04-6790 is inconsistent and seems to depend on the behavioral test variant in use. Trace conditioning holds promise as a behavioral assay for hippocampus-dependent working memory function. Accordingly, Experiment 1 assessed the effect of Ro 04-6790 (5 and 10mg/kg i.p.) on associating a noise conditioned stimulus paired with foot shock (unconditioned stimulus) at a 3 or 30s trace interval in adult male Wistar rats. Contextual conditioning was measured as suppression to the contextual cues provided by the experimental chambers and as suppression to a temporally extended light background stimulus which provided an experimental context. Experiment 2 assessed the effect of Ro 04-6790 (5 and 10mg/kg i.p.) on recognition memory as tested by the exploration of novel relative to familiar objects in an open arena. In Experiment 1, Ro 04-6790 (5 and 10mg/kg) was without effect on trace and contextual conditioning. In Experiment 2, there was no indication of the expected improvement under Ro 04-6790 at the same doses previously found to enhance recognition memory as measured in tests of novel object exploration. Thus, there was no evidence that treatment with the 5-HT6 receptor antagonist Ro 04-6790 acted as a cognitive enhancer in either trace conditioning or object recognition procedures. We cannot exclude the possibility that the experimental procedures used in the present study would have been sensitive to the cognitive enhancing effects of Ro 04-6790 in a different dose range, behavioral test variant, or in a different strain of rat. Nonetheless the drug treatment was not ineffective in that object exploration was reduced under 10mg/kg Ro 04-6790.
5-羟色胺6(5-HT6)受体拮抗剂(如Ro 04-6790)具有认知增强作用的证据并不一致,而且似乎取决于所使用的行为测试变量。痕迹条件反射有望成为一种用于评估海马体依赖性工作记忆功能的行为测定方法。因此,实验1评估了Ro 04-6790(腹腔注射,剂量为5和10mg/kg)对成年雄性Wistar大鼠在3秒或30秒痕迹间隔下,将噪声条件刺激与足部电击(非条件刺激)进行关联的影响。情境条件反射通过对实验箱提供的情境线索的抑制以及对提供实验情境的时间延长的光背景刺激的抑制来衡量。实验2评估了Ro 04-6790(腹腔注射,剂量为5和10mg/kg)对识别记忆的影响,方法是在开放场地中探索新物体相对于熟悉物体的情况。在实验1中,Ro 04-6790(5和10mg/kg)对痕迹条件反射和情境条件反射均无影响。在实验2中,在先前发现能增强识别记忆的相同剂量下,Ro 04-6790并没有出现预期的改善,这一改善是通过新物体探索测试来衡量的。因此,没有证据表明5-HT6受体拮抗剂Ro 04-6790在痕迹条件反射或物体识别程序中起到了认知增强剂的作用。我们不能排除这样一种可能性,即本研究中使用的实验程序在不同的剂量范围、行为测试变量或不同品系的大鼠中可能对Ro 04-6790的认知增强作用敏感。尽管如此,药物治疗并非无效,因为在10mg/kg的Ro 04-6790作用下,物体探索减少了。