Batnini Soulef, Uno Akira
Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; LD/Dyslexia Centre, Chiba, Japan.
Brain Dev. 2015 Jun;37(6):579-91. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
This study investigated first the main cognitive abilities; phonological processing, visual cognition, automatization and receptive vocabulary in predicting reading and spelling abilities in Arabic. Second, we compared good/poor readers and spellers to detect the characteristics of cognitive predictors which contribute to identifying reading and spelling difficulties in Arabic speaking children.
A sample of 116 Tunisian third-grade children was tested on their abilities to read and spell, phonological processing, visual cognition, automatization and receptive vocabulary.
For reading, phonological processing and automatization uniquely predicted Arabic word reading and paragraph reading abilities. Automatization uniquely predicted Arabic non-word reading ability. For spelling, phonological processing was a unique predictor for Arabic word spelling ability. Furthermore, poor readers had significantly lower scores on the phonological processing test and slower reading times on the automatization test as compared with good readers. Additionally, poor spellers showed lower scores on the phonological processing test as compared with good spellers. Visual cognitive processing and receptive vocabulary were not significant cognitive predictors of Arabic reading and spelling abilities for Tunisian third grade children in this study.
Our results are consistent with previous studies in alphabetic orthographies and demonstrate that phonological processing and automatization are the best cognitive predictors in detecting early literacy problems. We suggest including phonological processing and automatization tasks in screening tests and in intervention programs may help Tunisian children with poor literacy skills overcome reading and spelling difficulties in Arabic.
本研究首先调查了主要认知能力,即语音处理、视觉认知、自动化和接受性词汇在预测阿拉伯语阅读和拼写能力方面的作用。其次,我们比较了阅读和拼写能力强/弱的儿童,以检测有助于识别说阿拉伯语儿童阅读和拼写困难的认知预测因素的特征。
对116名突尼斯三年级儿童进行了阅读和拼写能力、语音处理、视觉认知、自动化和接受性词汇方面的测试。
对于阅读,语音处理和自动化分别独特地预测了阿拉伯语单词阅读和段落阅读能力。自动化单独预测了阿拉伯语非单词阅读能力。对于拼写,语音处理是阿拉伯语单词拼写能力的唯一预测因素。此外,与阅读能力强的儿童相比,阅读能力弱的儿童在语音处理测试中的得分显著更低,在自动化测试中的阅读时间更慢。此外,与拼写能力强的儿童相比,拼写能力弱的儿童在语音处理测试中的得分更低。在本研究中,视觉认知处理和接受性词汇并不是突尼斯三年级儿童阿拉伯语阅读和拼写能力的重要认知预测因素。
我们的结果与先前在字母文字体系中的研究一致,表明语音处理和自动化是检测早期读写问题的最佳认知预测因素。我们建议在筛查测试和干预项目中纳入语音处理和自动化任务,这可能有助于突尼斯读写能力差的儿童克服阿拉伯语阅读和拼写困难。