Suppr超能文献

半月板根部撕裂:一种基于撕裂形态的分类系统。

Meniscal root tears: a classification system based on tear morphology.

作者信息

LaPrade Christopher M, James Evan W, Cram Tyler R, Feagin John A, Engebretsen Lars, LaPrade Robert F

机构信息

Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA.

The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):363-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546514559684. Epub 2014 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Meniscal root tears present in many forms and can have profound consequences on the health of knee articular cartilage. While the biomechanics, natural history, and treatment of root tears have been increasingly investigated, the spectrum of meniscal root tear patterns observed during arthroscopic examination has yet to be defined and categorized.

PURPOSE

To establish a classification system for meniscal root tears by reporting the morphology of meniscal root tears from a consecutive series of arthroscopic surgeries. It was hypothesized that meniscal root tears could be grouped into types by distinct tear patterns and that recognition of tear pattern would affect treatment choice.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

All patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery from April 2010 to May 2014 by a single orthopaedic surgeon were included. After arthroscopic examination, data regarding the integrity of the meniscal roots were prospectively recorded in a data registry. Tear morphology and treatment received were subsequently extracted by 2 independent reviewers from operative notes and arthroscopic surgical photos.

RESULTS

A total of 71 meniscal root tears in 67 patients were grouped into tear types with similar tear morphologies. Meniscal root tear patterns were categorized into partial stable root tears (type 1; n = 5); complete radial tears within 9 mm of the bony root attachment (type 2; n = 48), further subclassified into types 2A, 2B, and 2C, located 0 to <3 mm, 3 to <6 mm, and 6 to 9 mm from the root attachment, respectively; bucket-handle tears with a complete root detachment (type 3; n = 4); complex oblique tears with complete root detachments extending into the root attachment (type 4; n = 7); and bony avulsion fractures of the root attachments (type 5; n = 7).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that it was possible to establish a concise classification system to group patients with meniscal root tears by tear morphology. Treatments received varied across tear types.

摘要

背景

半月板根部撕裂有多种形式,可对膝关节软骨健康产生深远影响。虽然半月板根部撕裂的生物力学、自然病程及治疗方法已得到越来越多的研究,但关节镜检查中观察到的半月板根部撕裂模式范围尚未明确分类。

目的

通过报告一系列连续关节镜手术中半月板根部撕裂的形态,建立半月板根部撕裂的分类系统。研究假设半月板根部撕裂可根据不同的撕裂模式分为不同类型,且撕裂模式的识别会影响治疗选择。

研究设计

病例系列;证据等级,4级。

方法

纳入2010年4月至2014年5月由同一位骨科医生进行关节镜手术的所有患者。关节镜检查后,有关半月板根部完整性的数据被前瞻性记录在数据登记册中。随后,2名独立审阅者从手术记录和关节镜手术照片中提取撕裂形态及接受的治疗信息。

结果

67例患者中的71处半月板根部撕裂被分为具有相似撕裂形态的撕裂类型。半月板根部撕裂模式分为部分稳定根部撕裂(1型;n = 5);距骨根部附着点9 mm内的完全放射状撕裂(2型;n = 48),进一步细分为2A、2B和2C型,分别位于距根部附着点0至<3 mm、3至<6 mm和6至9 mm处;伴有根部完全离断的桶柄状撕裂(3型;n = 4);根部完全离断并延伸至根部附着点的复杂斜形撕裂(4型;n = 7);以及根部附着点的骨撕脱骨折(5型;n = 7)。

结论

本研究表明,根据撕裂形态建立一个简洁的分类系统对半月板根部撕裂患者进行分组是可行的。不同撕裂类型接受的治疗各不相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验