Suppr超能文献

质量改进还是研究——抉择何去何从。

Quality improvement or research--deciding which road to take.

作者信息

Stausmire Julie M

机构信息

Julie M. Stausmire is an academic research coordinator at Mercy St Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio.

出版信息

Crit Care Nurse. 2014 Dec;34(6):58-63. doi: 10.4037/ccn2014177.

Abstract

Critical care nurses are constantly challenged to provide safe, high-quality patient care at a low cost with increasingly scarce resources while implementing the latest evidence-based practices into their own clinical practice. This article is the first in a 4-part series to provide a practical quality improvement guide for critical care nurses interested in implementing system process or performance improvement projects within their own units. Part 1 is designed to answer the question "What method is better for measuring real-world patient outcomes-quality improvement or clinical research?" A broad overview of the differences between quality improvement and clinical research is provided. A newly published checklist to differentiate between attributes of each process is introduced, and readers can test their own knowledge between quality improvement and research with a quick quiz of studies recently published in Critical Care Nurse.

摘要

重症监护护士面临着持续的挑战,要在资源日益稀缺的情况下,以低成本提供安全、高质量的患者护理,同时将最新的循证实践应用于自身的临床实践中。本文是一个四部分系列文章中的第一篇,为有兴趣在自己科室开展系统流程或绩效改进项目的重症监护护士提供一份实用的质量改进指南。第一部分旨在回答“哪种方法更适合衡量实际患者结局——质量改进还是临床研究?”这一问题。文中对质量改进和临床研究之间的差异进行了广泛概述。还介绍了一份新发布的用于区分每个过程属性的清单,读者可以通过对《重症监护护士》最近发表的研究进行快速测验,来检验自己在质量改进和研究方面的知识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验