Suppr超能文献

[宫腔镜检查的新进展:宫腔镜组织粉碎器]

[New in hysteroscopy: hysteroscopic morcellators].

作者信息

Garbin O, Schwartz L

机构信息

CMCO, pôle de gynécologie obstétrique des hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67300 Schiltigheim, France.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014 Dec;42(12):872-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

Abstract

A new technology recently appeared for the treatment of endo-uterine pathologies: hysteroscopic morcellators. It seemed to us useful to review this new technology. The morcellator we mostly experiment is the Myosure®, in 14 patients, with a median age of 40.5 years (28-58). The time of procedure went from 5 to 75 min with a median time at 26 min. The median of the total fluid deficit was 300 mL (0-1500 mL). A conversion in traditional resectoscopy happened in 4 cases (29%). This results are not so good as in literature. This is probably bound to one the learning curve but also the type of pathology. For the operative time, all the studies agree that hysteroscopic morcellation is faster than hysteroscopic resection. The quantity of fluid used is also lesser, as the deficit of fluid when the morcellator is used. The percentage of success to remove the pathology is high, close to 100% for the polyps and 92% for the submucous myomas. The indications are the polyps and the submucous myomas type 0 or 1. The morcellation of remnant trophoblastic tissues is also described and seems effective. Others indications, as the removal of uterine septum or cure of uterine synechias, are criticisable. In conclusion, hysteroscopic morcellators are probably a great progress for the cure of the endo-uterine pathologies. They cannot yet concurrence the hysterosopic resectoscopes for the treatment of big submucous myoma or those with a large intramyometrial involvement.

摘要

最近出现了一种用于治疗子宫内病变的新技术

宫腔镜旋切器。我们认为回顾这项新技术是有必要的。我们主要试验的旋切器是Myosure®,共14例患者,中位年龄40.5岁(28 - 58岁)。手术时间从5分钟到75分钟不等,中位时间为26分钟。总液体缺失量的中位数为300毫升(0 - 1500毫升)。4例(29%)转为传统的宫腔镜电切术。这些结果不如文献报道的好。这可能与学习曲线以及病变类型有关。对于手术时间,所有研究都认为宫腔镜旋切术比宫腔镜切除术更快。使用的液体量也更少,因为使用旋切器时液体缺失量较少。切除病变的成功率很高,息肉的成功率接近100%,黏膜下肌瘤的成功率为92%。适应证为息肉和0型或1型黏膜下肌瘤。也有关于残留滋养层组织旋切的描述,且似乎有效。其他适应证,如切除子宫纵隔或治疗子宫粘连,则存在争议。总之,宫腔镜旋切器可能是治疗子宫内病变的一大进步。但对于治疗大的黏膜下肌瘤或肌层内累及范围大的肌瘤,它们尚不能与宫腔镜电切镜相媲美。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验