Suppr超能文献

使用计算机断层扫描和股骨远端轴向放射摄影测量髁扭转角的可重复性。

Reproducibility of condylar twist angle measurement using computed tomography and axial radiography of the distal femur.

作者信息

Kobayashi H, Aratake M, Akamatsu Y, Mitsugi N, Taki N, Saito T

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9, Fukuura, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Dec;100(8):885-90. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.025. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is essential to understand rotational alignment of the distal femur when performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several rotational landmarks including condylar twist angle (CTA) are used for preoperative planning and during TKA. Axial radiography of the distal femur is used for measuring the CTA, and assessing rotational alignment in TKA. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and the reproducibility of the CTA using two different methods and evaluate if CTA differed between varus and valgus knees and between normal and osteoarthritic knees.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CTA were obtained from 144 knees (77 patients) having total knee or hip arthroplasty using computed tomography (CT) and axial radiography. Subjects were divided into five groups based on femorotibial angle (FTA) and into four groups based on the severity of knee osteoarthritis. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities of these methods and inter-method differences were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean CTA was 7.02° with axial radiography, and 6.87° with CT images. There were no significant differences among the five FTA groups and among the four osteoarthritis groups. In total, intra-/inter-observer, and inter-method intraclass correlation coefficients were substantial or almost perfect in the scoring system of Landis et al. However, discrepancies ≥ 2° between the two methods were observed in more than 20% of knees.

CONCLUSION

The CTA should be reassessed by more than two observers or two methods for precise preoperative TKA planning in cases where it is difficult to identify the bony landmarks for CTA measurements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

引言

在进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)时,了解股骨远端的旋转对线至关重要。包括髁扭转角(CTA)在内的几个旋转标志点用于术前规划和TKA手术过程中。股骨远端的轴向X线摄影用于测量CTA,并评估TKA中的旋转对线。本研究的目的是使用两种不同方法研究CTA的可靠性和可重复性,并评估内翻膝和外翻膝之间以及正常膝和骨关节炎膝之间的CTA是否存在差异。

材料与方法

使用计算机断层扫描(CT)和轴向X线摄影从144例接受全膝关节或髋关节置换术的膝关节(77例患者)中获取CTA。根据股胫角(FTA)将受试者分为五组,根据膝关节骨关节炎的严重程度分为四组。评估了这些方法的观察者内和观察者间可靠性以及方法间差异。

结果

轴向X线摄影测得的平均CTA为7.02°,CT图像测得的平均CTA为6.87°。五个FTA组和四个骨关节炎组之间均无显著差异。总体而言,在Landis等人的评分系统中,观察者内/间和方法间组内相关系数均较高或几乎完美。然而,在超过20%的膝关节中观察到两种方法之间的差异≥2°。

结论

在难以识别用于CTA测量的骨性标志点的情况下,为了进行精确的术前TKA规划,应由两名以上观察者或两种方法重新评估CTA。

证据水平

III级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验