Espié A, Chaput B, Murgier J, Bayle-Iniguez X, Elia F, Chiron P
Clinique Toulouse-Lautrec, 2, rue Jacques-Monod, 81000 Albi, France.
Service de chirurgie orthopédique, hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU de Toulouse Purpan, secteur A, 5(e) étage, place du Docteur-Baylac, TSA 40 031, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Dec;100(8):843-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
The many radiographic views suggested for evaluating anterior femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), due to a cam effect, are not specific for this condition and have not been proven of diagnostic value in studies, including control groups. Using a new and specific radiographic view, we evaluated the reproducibility of the main radiographic criteria for FAI, determined normal values for these criteria in a control group, and established diagnostic threshold values.
This specific view offers good reproducibility and effectively detects abnormal values of criteria for FAI.
Inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility of specific radiographic criteria (αangle and modified head-neck offset [HNO]) were computed from preoperative and postoperative radiographs of 96 hips (75 patients, 61 males and 14 females) using the specific 45°-45°-30° frog-leg view (F45 view). Values in the group with FAI were compared to those in a control group of asymptomatic volunteers (100 hips, 27 males and 23 females).
Inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility was very good, with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.955and 0.987, respectively, for the α angle and of 0.895 and 0.984, respectively, for the HNO. Mean values of both parameters differed significantly between the FAI and control groups: 73.9° (53° to 96°) vs. 49.3° (35° to 69°) for the αangle, respectively; and 2.5mm (-4.6 to 9.4) vs. 7.6mm (1.7 to 11.8) for HNO, respectively. The normal values defined as the boundary of the 95% reference interval in the control group were<60.2° for the α angle, and>4.6mm for the HNO.
The45°-45°-30° frog-leg view is useful for diagnosing FAI due to a cam effect. This view is easy to perform, and the thresholds determined in our study assist in its interpretation: α angle values>58° in females and>63° in males indicate cam-type femoral geometry. In both genders, HNO values<5mm support a diagnosis of anterior FAI.
Level III, case-control study.
由于凸轮效应,用于评估股骨髋臼前撞击症(FAI)的多种X线片视图并非针对该病症具有特异性,并且在包括对照组的研究中尚未被证明具有诊断价值。我们使用一种新的特异性X线片视图,评估了FAI主要X线片标准的可重复性,确定了对照组中这些标准的正常值,并建立了诊断阈值。
这种特异性视图具有良好的可重复性,并能有效检测出FAI标准的异常值。
使用特异性45°-45°-30°蛙腿视图(F45视图),从96例髋关节(75例患者,61例男性和14例女性)的术前和术后X线片中计算特定X线片标准(α角和改良头颈偏移[HNO])的观察者间和观察者内可重复性。将FAI组的值与无症状志愿者对照组(100例髋关节,27例男性和23例女性)的值进行比较。
观察者间和观察者内可重复性非常好,α角的组内相关系数分别为0.9