Suppr超能文献

慢性肾脏病和透析方式对非肾脏清除机制药物暴露的影响。

Effect of CKD and dialysis modality on exposure to drugs cleared by nonrenal mechanisms.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Apr;65(4):574-82. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with kidney disease frequently experience adverse effects from medication exposure, even when drugs are cleared by nonrenal pathways. Although many studies suggest that nonrenal drug clearance is decreased in chronic kidney disease (CKD), there remains a paucity of in vivo studies in patients with varying degrees of decreased kidney function and those comparing the impact of dialysis modality (eg, hemodialysis [HD] and peritoneal dialysis [PD]).

STUDY DESIGN

We performed in vivo clinical pharmacokinetic studies of midazolam, a nonrenally cleared specific probe for CYP3A4, and fexofenadine, a nonspecific probe for hepatic and intestinal transporters.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Healthy controls (n=8), patients with non-dialysis-dependent (NDD)-CKD (n=8), and patients receiving HD (n=10) or PD (n=8).

OUTCOMES

Exposure to midazolam and fexofenadine were quantified using area under the curve (AUC). Comprehensive pharmacokinetic parameters also were calculated for both probes.

RESULTS

Midazolam AUC was significantly higher in the HD group (382.8 h·ng/mL) than in the healthy-control (63.0 h·ng/mL; P<0.001), NDD-CKD (84.5 h·ng/mL; P=0.002), and PD (47.4 h·ng/mL; P<0.001) groups. Fexofenadine AUC was significantly higher in each of the NDD-CKD (2,950 h·ng/mL; P=0.003), HD (2,327 h·ng/mL; P=0.01), and PD (2,095 h·ng/mL; P=0.04) groups compared with healthy controls (1,008 h·ng/mL).

LIMITATIONS

Small study groups had different proportions of diabetic patients, early stages of CKD not available.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that selection of dialysis modality is a major determinant of exposure to the CYP3A4 probe midazolam. Exposure to the intestinal and hepatic transporter probe fexofenadine is altered in patients with NDD-CKD and PD and HD patients. Thus, drug development and licensing of nonrenally cleared drugs should include evaluation in these 3 patient groups, with these results included in approved product information labeling. This reinforces the critical need for more in vivo studies of humans that evaluate the exposure to drugs cleared by these pathways.

摘要

背景

即使药物通过非肾脏途径清除,患有肾脏疾病的患者经常会因药物暴露而出现不良反应。尽管许多研究表明,慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的非肾清除药物清除率降低,但在肾功能不同程度降低的患者中,以及在比较透析方式(例如血液透析[HD]和腹膜透析[PD])对药物清除率的影响方面,体内研究仍然很少。

研究设计

我们对咪达唑仑进行了体内临床药代动力学研究,咪达唑仑是非肾清除的 CYP3A4 特异性探针,还对非索非那定进行了研究,非索非那定是一种非特异性探针,用于研究肝和肠转运体。

设置和参与者

健康对照者(n=8)、非透析依赖型(NDD)-CKD 患者(n=8)和接受 HD(n=10)或 PD(n=8)治疗的患者。

结果

使用曲线下面积(AUC)定量评估咪达唑仑和非索非那定的暴露情况。还计算了两种探针的综合药代动力学参数。

结果

HD 组咪达唑仑 AUC 明显高于健康对照组(63.0 h·ng/mL;P<0.001)、NDD-CKD 组(84.5 h·ng/mL;P=0.002)和 PD 组(47.4 h·ng/mL;P<0.001)。非索非那定 AUC 在 NDD-CKD 组(2950 h·ng/mL;P=0.003)、HD 组(2327 h·ng/mL;P=0.01)和 PD 组(2095 h·ng/mL;P=0.04)均明显高于健康对照组(1008 h·ng/mL)。

局限性

研究小组规模较小,糖尿病患者比例不同,CKD 早期阶段的数据不可用。

结论

我们的数据表明,透析方式的选择是影响 CYP3A4 探针咪达唑仑暴露的主要决定因素。非索非那定在 NDD-CKD 和 PD 以及 HD 患者中的肠道和肝转运体探针的暴露情况发生改变。因此,非肾脏清除药物的药物开发和许可应包括在这 3 组患者中进行评估,并将这些结果纳入已批准产品信息标签中。这再次强调了对评估这些途径清除的药物的人体进行更多体内研究的迫切需要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验