• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫苗上市后批准监测与监管中的伦理考量

Ethical considerations in post-market-approval monitoring and regulation of vaccines.

作者信息

Thompson Alison, Komparic Ana, Smith Maxwell J

机构信息

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3M2; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 3M7; University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 3M7.

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3M2; University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 3M7.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2014 Dec 12;32(52):7171-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.016
PMID:25454882
Abstract

The objective of this paper is to identify and articulate ethical considerations to help guide decision-making around the regulation and monitoring of vaccines post-licensure. While these considerations are not intended to be an exhaustive account of the ethical concerns, they can facilitate the explicit examination of ethical issues in this context. We identify the protection of public from harm as the primary consideration, and identify others that help in the discharging of this governmental obligation. Others include: transparency, a publicly acceptable risk-benefit profile, public trust, minimization of stigma, and special obligations to vulnerable populations. Regulators and researchers can use these ethical considerations to help enhance their reasoning and to improve the accountability of their decision-making. These considerations can be used to inform rational deliberations about how to balance the obligation to protect the public from harm with other relevant considerations such as the need to be transparent, while taking into account the contextual features of the situation. Further research and debate on the relevance and refinement of these ethical considerations is desirable.

摘要

本文的目的是识别并阐明伦理考量因素,以帮助指导疫苗获得许可后的监管和监测方面的决策。虽然这些考量并非旨在详尽阐述所有伦理问题,但它们有助于在此背景下对伦理问题进行明确审视。我们将保护公众免受伤害视为首要考量因素,并确定有助于履行这一政府义务的其他因素。其他因素包括:透明度、公众可接受的风险效益状况、公众信任、耻辱感最小化以及对弱势群体的特殊义务。监管机构和研究人员可利用这些伦理考量因素来增强其推理能力,并提高其决策的问责性。这些考量因素可用于为有关如何在保护公众免受伤害的义务与其他相关因素(如透明度需求)之间取得平衡的合理审议提供信息,同时考虑到具体情况的背景特征。对这些伦理考量因素的相关性和完善进行进一步的研究和辩论是很有必要的。

相似文献

1
Ethical considerations in post-market-approval monitoring and regulation of vaccines.疫苗上市后批准监测与监管中的伦理考量
Vaccine. 2014 Dec 12;32(52):7171-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
2
Evidence-based decision making for vaccines: the need for an ethical foundation.循证决策疫苗:需要伦理基础。
Vaccine. 2012 Feb 1;30(6):1009-13. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.053. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
3
Vaccine effects and impact of vaccination programmes in post-licensure studies.疫苗效力和疫苗接种计划在上市后研究中的影响。
Vaccine. 2013 Nov 19;31(48):5634-42. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
4
An ethical framework for public health immunisation programs.
N S W Public Health Bull. 2012 May-Jun;23(5-6):111-5. doi: 10.1071/NB11045.
5
What is the responsibility of national government with respect to vaccination?国家政府在疫苗接种方面的职责是什么?
Vaccine. 2014 Dec 12;32(52):7163-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
6
What are the moral obligations of the traveller in relation to vaccination?旅行者在疫苗接种方面有哪些道德义务?
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2007 Mar;5(2):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2006.01.005. Epub 2006 May 11.
7
Vaccination and the prevention problem.
Bioethics. 2004 Nov;18(6):515-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00414.x.
8
The ethics of disease eradication.疾病根除的伦理问题。
Vaccine. 2014 Dec 12;32(52):7179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
9
Criteria for inclusion of vaccinations in public programmes.纳入公共规划疫苗的标准。
Vaccine. 2010 Apr 9;28(17):2924-31. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.021. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
10
Ethical considerations for vaccination programmes in acute humanitarian emergencies.突发人道主义紧急情况下疫苗接种规划的伦理考量。
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Apr 1;91(4):290-7. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.113480. Epub 2013 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of ethical considerations of COVID‑19 vaccination: lessons for future.新冠疫苗接种的伦理考量分析:对未来的启示。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 27;24(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00969-y.
2
Dengue vaccine: local decisions, global consequences.登革热疫苗:本地决策,全球影响。
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Nov 1;94(11):850-855. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.168765. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
3
An Ethical Justification for Expanding the Notion of Effectiveness in Vaccine Post-Market Monitoring: Insights from the HPV Vaccine in Canada.
扩大疫苗上市后监测有效性概念的伦理依据:来自加拿大HPV疫苗的见解
Public Health Ethics. 2016 Apr;9(1):78-91. doi: 10.1093/phe/phu049. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
4
Ethics and Childhood Vaccination Policy in the United States.美国的伦理与儿童疫苗接种政策
Am J Public Health. 2016 Feb;106(2):273-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302952. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
5
Comparative Safety of Vaccine Adjuvants: A Summary of Current Evidence and Future Needs.疫苗佐剂的比较安全性:当前证据与未来需求综述
Drug Saf. 2015 Nov;38(11):1059-74. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0350-4.