Gardner Aimee K, Sudan Ranjan, Sidhu Ravi, Mann Barry D, Scott Daniel J
Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Am J Surg. 2015 Jan;209(1):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.028. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
The Association for Surgical Education established the Center for Excellence in Surgical Education Research and Training (CESERT) program in 1999 to support innovative research and education projects and programs that will advance surgical education. We sought to examine scholarly outcomes of the projects during the first 15 years of the program.
E-mail surveys were sent to the 24 researchers who were awarded CESERT grants. Data collection focused on recipient professional experiences, publications, and presentations stemming from CESERT-funded research and impact on career development. For grant recipients who were unable to complete the survey, we obtained publication information on studies authored by the grant recipients that described the same grant-funded topic, described similar methods, and fell within the study timeline.
Complete survey data were obtained from 18 of the 24 grant recipients. Grants were most commonly awarded to General Surgeons (40%) and Education and Psychology PhDs (24%). Overall, 23 of the 25 projects had reached completion at the time of contact, and from these, 70 articles were published or in press. Abstract presentations were more common, with respondents documenting 84 projects locally, nationally, and internationally. Grant awards ranged from $8,122 to $97,000, with an average of $39,026. In total, the Association for Surgical Education Foundation distributed $988,000 in grant funding from 1999 to 2013. Respondents reported that CESERT funding was critical to their career as it legitimized their pursuit of educational research, helped them establish multidisciplinary and multi-institutional collaborations, provided greater visibility for their research, and helped them develop an understanding of educational principles and grant writing skills.
Overall, the CESERT program has produced remarkable results. The careful review process and monitoring protocol have ensured that high-potential studies are funded and successful. These data support continued efforts to garner resources such that CESERT grants may be awarded to fund high-quality, high-impact projects.
外科教育协会于1999年设立了卓越外科教育研究与培训中心(CESERT)项目,以支持能够推动外科教育发展的创新性研究及教育项目。我们试图考察该项目头15年中各项目的学术成果。
向24位获得CESERT资助的研究人员发送了电子邮件调查问卷。数据收集聚焦于受资助者的专业经历、源自CESERT资助研究的出版物和报告,以及对职业发展的影响。对于无法完成调查的资助获得者,我们获取了由这些资助获得者撰写的、描述相同资助主题、采用相似方法且在研究时间范围内的研究的出版信息。
24位资助获得者中有18位提供了完整的调查数据。资助最常授予普通外科医生(40%)和教育与心理学博士(24%)。总体而言,在联系时25个项目中有23个已完成,其中70篇文章已发表或正在发表。摘要报告更为常见,受访者记录了在本地、全国和国际范围内的84个项目。资助金额从8122美元到97000美元不等,平均为39026美元。1999年至2013年,外科教育协会基金会总共发放了988000美元的资助资金。受访者报告称,CESERT资助对他们的职业生涯至关重要,因为它使他们对教育研究的追求合法化,帮助他们建立多学科和多机构合作,提高了他们研究的知名度,并帮助他们理解教育原则和资助申请写作技巧。
总体而言,CESERT项目取得了显著成果。严谨的评审流程和监督方案确保了有潜力的研究获得资助并取得成功。这些数据支持继续努力筹集资源,以便能够授予CESERT资助,为高质量、高影响力的项目提供资金。