• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the research grant program of the Foundation of the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists, 1995-2008.1995 - 2008年加拿大医院药剂师协会基金会研究资助项目评估
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2011 Nov;64(6):399-404. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v64i6.1080.
2
Important returns on investment: an evaluation of a national research grants competition in emergency medicine.重要的投资回报:一项针对急诊医学国家研究资助竞赛的评估。
CJEM. 2010 Jan;12(1):33-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011994.
3
The association for surgical education CESERT grant program: the first 15 years.外科教育协会CESERT资助项目:头15年
Am J Surg. 2015 Jan;209(1):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.028. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
4
Characteristics and Outcomes of Research Funded by the American Head and Neck Society Foundation.美国头颈部协会基金会资助的研究的特点和结果。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Dec 1;146(12):1120-1124. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3054.
5
Are We Spending Wisely? Impact of POSNA Grants on Scholarly Productivity and Future Funding Success.我们的资金使用明智吗?小儿骨科医师协会(POSNA)资助对学术产出及未来获得资助成功的影响。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Jan;39(1):e82-e86. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001261.
6
Outcomes associated with 12 years of grant funding: the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society grant program.与12年资助相关的成果:儿科内分泌护理协会资助项目
J Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Jun;22(3):166-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2007.03.002.
7
Research awards program of the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society/Canadian Anesthesia Research Foundation: survey of past recipients.加拿大麻醉医师协会/加拿大麻醉研究基金会研究奖项计划:对往届获奖者的调查
Can J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;54(4):314-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03022778.
8
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Foundation Research and Fellowship Awards: A 26-Year Review at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard School of Dental Medicine.口腔颌面外科基金会研究与奖学金奖项:麻省总医院和哈佛牙医学院26年回顾
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;74(2):234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
9
[Brief analysis of the application and funding projects of National Natural Science Foundation of China in the discipline of burns and plastic surgery over the years].[历年国家自然科学基金在烧伤整形外科学科的申请及资助项目简要分析]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 20;35(12):866-871. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.12.007.
10
Productivity and career paths of previous recipients of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine research grant awards.学术急诊医学协会研究资助奖既往获得者的生产力和职业道路。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jun;15(6):560-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00111.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Research Grants from the CSHP Research and Education Foundation.来自加拿大医院药师协会研究与教育基金会的研究资助。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2012 Mar;65(2):152. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v65i2.1124.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterizing the American college of clinical pharmacy practice-based research network.描述美国临床药学学院实践为基础的研究网络。
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Aug;30(8):865. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.8.865.
2
Important returns on investment: an evaluation of a national research grants competition in emergency medicine.重要的投资回报:一项针对急诊医学国家研究资助竞赛的评估。
CJEM. 2010 Jan;12(1):33-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011994.
3
Research publication by pharmacist authors in major medical journals: changes over a 10-year interval.药剂师作者在主要医学期刊上发表的研究:十年间的变化
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 May;28(5):584-90. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.5.584.
4
The state of science and research in clinical pharmacy.临床药学的科研现状
Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Jul;26(7):1027-40. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.7.1027.

1995 - 2008年加拿大医院药剂师协会基金会研究资助项目评估

Evaluation of the research grant program of the Foundation of the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists, 1995-2008.

作者信息

Zed Peter J, Ensom Mary H H, Slavik Richard S, Wilbur Kerry, Kanji Salmaan, Koshman Sheri L, Irvine-Meek Janice, Perreault Marc, Zelenitsky Sheryl

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.

出版信息

Can J Hosp Pharm. 2011 Nov;64(6):399-404. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v64i6.1080.

DOI:10.4212/cjhp.v64i6.1080
PMID:22479094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3242572/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacist-led research has grown substantially over the past 10 to 15 years. The Research Grant Program of the Research and Education Foundation of the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists (CSHP Foundation), initiated in 1992, is the only funding opportunity available specifically to members of the Society.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the status of research projects funded by the Research Grant Program of the CSHP Foundation, to examine the outcomes of these projects, and to determine the opinions of grant recipients regarding this competition.

METHODS

An e-mail survey was sent to each of the 34 hospital pharmacist researchers who received funding from the Research Grant Program of the CSHP Foundation during the period 1995 to 2008. Survey questions sought to evaluate scholarly outcomes (i.e., publications and presentations) from funded projects. The opinions of grant recipients about the value of the program were also solicited.

RESULTS

One of the potential respondents had returned the grant money and was ineligible for the survey. Of the 33 potential respondents, 30 (91%) responded to the survey. Overall, 24 of the projects had been completed at the time of the survey, and 19 of these had been published, resulting in a total of 26 manuscripts. Abstracts had been presented for 21 of the projects. In total, 49 abstracts had been presented at national (22), international (13), provincial (7) and local (7) conferences. The median award was $5000 (interquartile range $5000 to $7500). Eleven of the projects had received additional funding, primarily from the recipient's hospital or health authority or from university sources. The survey respondents indicated that the grant from the CSHP Foundation had been critical to completion of their projects and had been of assistance in securing additional funding, when such funding was necessary. Respondents felt that dedicated research funding for hospital pharmacists in Canada should continue.

CONCLUSIONS

The Research Grant Program of the CSHP Foundation has been important to hospital pharmacists, enabling a variety of research projects to be initiated and completed. The high rate of project completion and the large number of publications and presentations resulting from this work speak to both the quality of the work and the dedication of the research teams. The CSHP Foundation should continue to fund this competition and should explore a more robust model, with larger awards and more funded projects each year.

摘要

背景

在过去10至15年中,由药剂师主导的研究有了显著增长。加拿大医院药剂师协会研究与教育基金会(CSHP基金会)的研究资助计划始于1992年,是该协会成员唯一可获得的专项资助机会。

目的

评估由CSHP基金会研究资助计划资助的研究项目的状况,审查这些项目的成果,并确定资助获得者对该竞赛的看法。

方法

向1995年至2008年期间从CSHP基金会研究资助计划获得资助的34位医院药剂师研究人员每人发送了一份电子邮件调查问卷。调查问题旨在评估受资助项目的学术成果(即出版物和报告)。还征求了资助获得者对该计划价值的看法。

结果

一位潜在受访者已退还资助资金,不符合参与调查的条件。在33位潜在受访者中,30位(91%)回复了调查。总体而言,在调查时24个项目已完成,其中19个已发表,共形成26篇手稿。21个项目的摘要已在会议上发表。总共49篇摘要在全国性(22篇)、国际性(13篇)、省级(7篇)和地方性(7篇)会议上发表。资助金额中位数为5000加元(四分位距为5000至7500加元)。11个项目获得了额外资金,主要来自受资助者所在医院或卫生当局或大学。调查受访者表示,CSHP基金会的资助对其项目的完成至关重要,并且在必要时有助于获得额外资金。受访者认为加拿大应为医院药剂师提供专门的研究资金并应继续。

结论

CSHP基金会的研究资助计划对医院药剂师很重要,使各种研究项目得以启动和完成。这项工作的高项目完成率以及大量的出版物和报告表明了工作质量和研究团队的奉献精神。CSHP基金会应继续为该竞赛提供资金,并应探索一种更强大的模式,每年提供更大金额的资助和资助更多项目。