Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症患者基于情绪的决策缺陷;基于爱荷华赌博任务的新见解。

Deficits in emotion based decision-making in schizophrenia; a new insight based on the Iowa Gambling Task.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Behavioral Physiology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Psychiatry, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Ichihara, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar 3;57:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Oct 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Defective decision-making is a symptom of impaired cognitive function observed in patients with schizophrenia. Impairment on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) has been reported in patients with schizophrenia, but these results are inconsistent among studies.

METHODS

We differentiated subjects based on whether they expressed certainty at having deciphered an advantageous strategy in the course of the task. We investigated this impairment using the IGT in patients with schizophrenia and performed analysis different to standard advantageous decks minus disadvantageous decks in all 100 card choices, [C+D]-A+B. We examined the effects on behavior after receiving a big penalty.

RESULTS

Results were dependent on participants utilizing with or without certainty, the best strategy for positive gain. Schizophrenic patients without certainty failed to show card choice shift, from disadvantageous to advantageous decks. Differences in card choices on the IGT were clearly shown between patients with schizophrenia and normal controls by the use of improvement from block 1 to blocks 3-5, [C+D]-A+B (P<0.001), rather than by the composite value of blocks 3-5, [C+D]-A+B (P=0.011). The deficit of emotion-based learning in schizophrenia without uncertainty were related to scores on the SANS and S5 attention. In addition, S1 affective flattering and S4 anhedonia-asociality were also related to these deficits. For a while, normal controls showed a smooth shift from disadvantageous to advantageous decks after big penalties, with or without a certainty for strategy. However, patients with schizophrenia failed to show switching from disadvantageous to advantageous decks, even after big penalties, under the same conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight certainty of strategy and behavior after a big penalty, as two points of difference between patients with schizophrenia and normal controls in the accumulation of net scores.

摘要

背景

决策缺陷是精神分裂症患者认知功能障碍的一种症状。已有研究报道精神分裂症患者在 简式赌博任务(IGT)中存在损害,但这些结果在不同研究中并不一致。

方法

我们根据受试者在任务过程中是否确定已经破译了有利策略来对他们进行区分。我们使用 IGT 来研究精神分裂症患者的这种损害,并对标准的有利牌组减去不利牌组(1-100 次)的所有 100 次卡牌选择进行分析。我们检查了在受到大的惩罚后对行为的影响。

结果

结果取决于参与者是否利用了确定的最佳正增益策略。没有确定感的精神分裂症患者未能表现出从不利牌组到有利牌组的卡牌选择转变。通过使用从第 1 块到第 3-5 块的改进,[C+D]-[A+B]([41-100]-[1-20])(P<0.001),而不是通过第 3-5 块的综合值,[C+D]-[A+B](41-100)(P=0.011),精神分裂症患者和正常对照组在 IGT 上的卡牌选择差异明显。无不确定性的精神分裂症患者的情绪为基础的学习缺陷与 SANS 和 S5 注意力评分有关。此外,S1 情感讨好和 S4 快感缺失-社交障碍也与这些缺陷有关。一段时间后,即使在相同条件下,正常对照组在受到大的惩罚后,无论是有策略的确定感还是没有策略的确定感,都能从不利牌组顺利转换到有利牌组。然而,精神分裂症患者即使在受到大的惩罚后,也未能从不利牌组转换到有利牌组。

结论

我们的结果强调了策略和大惩罚后的行为的确定性,这是精神分裂症患者和正常对照组在净分数积累方面的两个区别点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验