Podczeck Fridrun, Newton J Michael, Fromme Paul
University College London, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK.
University College London, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK.
Int J Pharm. 2014 Dec 30;477(1-2):306-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.10.028. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
Flat, round tablets may have a breaking ("score") line. Pharmacopoeial tablet breaking load tests are diametral in their design, and industrially used breaking load testers often have automatic tablet feeding systems, which position the tablets between the loading platens of the machine with the breaking lines in random orientation to the applied load. The aim of this work was to ascertain the influence of the position of the breaking line in a diametral compression test using finite element methodology (FEM) and to compare the theoretical results with practical findings using commercially produced bevel-edged, scored tablets. Breaking line test positions at an angle of 0°, 22.5°, 45°, 67.5° and 90° relative to the loading plane were studied. FEM results obtained for fully elastic and elasto-plastic tablets were fairly similar, but they highlighted large differences in stress distributions depending on the position of the breaking line. The stress values at failure were predicted to be similar for tablets tested at an angle of 45° or above, whereas at lower test angles the predicted breaking loads were up to three times larger. The stress distributions suggested that not all breaking line angles would result in clean tensile failure. Practical results, however, did not confirm the differences in the predicted breaking loads, but they confirmed differences in the way tablets broke. The results suggest that it is not advisable to convert breaking loads obtained on scored tablets into tablet tensile strength values, and comparisons between different tablets or batches should carefully consider the orientation of the breaking line with respect to the loading plane, as the failure mechanisms appear to vary.
扁平圆形片剂可能有一条刻痕线。药典片剂断裂负荷试验在设计上是径向的,工业上使用的断裂负荷测试仪通常有自动片剂进料系统,该系统将片剂放置在机器的加载压板之间,刻痕线相对于施加的负荷呈随机取向。本研究的目的是使用有限元方法(FEM)确定刻痕线位置在径向压缩试验中的影响,并将理论结果与使用商业生产的斜边刻痕片剂的实际结果进行比较。研究了刻痕线相对于加载平面呈0°、22.5°、45°、67.5°和90°角的试验位置。对于完全弹性和弹塑性片剂获得的有限元结果相当相似,但它们突出了应力分布因刻痕线位置而异的巨大差异。预计在45°或以上角度测试的片剂在失效时的应力值相似,而在较低测试角度下,预计的断裂负荷高达三倍。应力分布表明,并非所有刻痕线角度都会导致干净的拉伸破坏。然而,实际结果并未证实预测断裂负荷的差异,但证实了片剂断裂方式的差异。结果表明,将刻痕片剂获得的断裂负荷转换为片剂拉伸强度值是不可取的,并且在比较不同片剂或批次时,应仔细考虑刻痕线相对于加载平面的取向,因为失效机制似乎有所不同。